The Pathology Of The “Self-Chosenness”
The Pathology Of The “Self-Chosenness”
Date: 24/12/2021Author: TheTaoOfAnarchy
TTOA: As I observed long time ago that when a person somehow for whatever reason believes that he/she was born with “a messianic duty and a right” to decide the fate of the whole humanity, that person is a psychopath by all definition. Here are the words of Barbara Marx Hubbard and Jacques Attali, both Jewish, who are two of this kind of psychopaths whose own words are evidences themselves of such, I coined, “intelligent idiocy.” For intelligence without wisdom is essentially destructive idiocy.
Please, read their own words from their own mouths, and then use your own critical thinking with your own diligence to decide for yourself, folks!
I have to admit that these psychopaths are very good at communication skills. They know how to manipulate convoluted “mouthful” words, often contradictory and oxymoronic. However, it’s quite easy to debunk their supposedly “arcane” and “esoteric” “grandiose concept” if you pay attention at these “words” and just ask obvious questions!
TheTaoOfAnarchy
PS, normally this long post could have been split into two separate articles. However since they and their “works” are in the same category, the same hubris and idiocy.. I don’t want to waste my time and space!
Evolution by Choice, Not Chance
“This act is as horrible as killing a cancer cell. It must be done for the sake of the future of the whole. So be it: be prepared for the selection process which is now beginning. We, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow; something must be done before the whole body is destroyed… The destructive one fourth must be eliminated from the social body.” ~ Barbara Marx Hubbard
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones. Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good. Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine! We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.” Jacques Attali
====
Evolution by Choice, Not Chance
Barbara Marx Hubbard interviewed by Dr. Gil Dekel.
Gil Dekel: What is the purpose of being a human-being?…
Barbara Marx Hubbard: The purpose of being a human-being is to fulfil the divine potential in each one of us… to express our creativity and live in the evolution of the world.
Gil: …And how do we achieve it?
Barbara: By identifying within ourselves the impulse to grow, to express and to say ‘yes’; and see which way we are attracted to give. Happiness comes from self-rewarding work that is of service. When you’re doing it, you feel it’s your calling; then you can make it work in the world.
To be a complete human-being you need to find your inner purpose, and say ‘yes’ to it. Often it means social entrepreneurship, and coming together with other people to create. You’re not usually going to school to learn it, and you’re not usually hired to do this job… This isn’t ordinary work in the sense that you get a job to survive. It is about finding your way to do it, simply because you love it, and because you’re yearning to be creative.
How do you ‘sense’ this inner creative call in you?
I breathe-in the feeling of inspiration of the entire process of creation. It feels like God as spirit in action, God as evolutionary impulse, God as creative intelligence. And then I imagine the whole universe as an expression of that. I take that into my own being and up through all my various Chakras and into my heart, into my upper heart where my vocation is. That’s my calling, my gift to give.
I feel guided by this great power of creative intention inside. So as I do my creative work in the world like right now, I’m feeling the impulse. Not only in me but in you as well; and as I’m feeling resonance going back-and-forth, it amplifies. And that is joyful and creative. So the whole opportunity becomes a deep incentive to continue to create…
Do you feel that resonance now, as we speak online via Skype?
Yes, I do; and I’m a great lover of the internet, and also of the concept of the Noosphere. I don’t know if you’ve heard that word, it’s by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. It means a mind-sphere or global-brain.
In the last ten years or so, planet earth has grown a new nervous system. You see Facebook, Twitter, billions of iphones, Google search engine. If you look at it from an evolutionary point of view, the planet has grown this new nervous system to connect the global consciousness.
The motivation to connect that which is creative and loving is profound, not only in my personal life purpose but the larger one, that I feel like… I’m always feeling this larger purpose calling, as well as the individual and unique purposes, and they blend as one in co-creation.
The Blast of The Earth Spirits
Let’s discuss the personal, not the universal. If you have a bad day, and someone is nasty to you for some reason, how do you connect with them right then?
That takes a lot of practice. I have a practice which I call ‘shifting from ego to essence.’ Ego is separated local personality self. It will be reactive for lots of reasons; including somebody being nasty, or just because something isn’t working for you and you feel depressed or – many, many reasons.
What I’ve learned to do is to quickly shift my attention to my essence. Breathe, do a little heart map if you’re familiar with that. Just breathe through your heart, and appreciate. And if you do it fast, you can avoid your nervous system getting corrupted by that reactive behavior. It takes skill to do that. You have to be dedicated to do it because it’s so easy to be reactive…
The biofeedback you get from reacting is pain. Reactive mode puts the biofeedback under stress, and that stress is debilitating in many ways, whereas the biofeedback you get from shifting your attention to your essential, true nature divine-self, is immediately rewarding that you get used to doing it fast.
You have been expressing many ideas relating to femininity. Not just in your books, but even now, as you explain how to connect with your so-called inner-self. I would argue this may be ‘easier’ for woman, so I would like to ask: How can men do it?…
I think it’s easier for women because women have been liberated in recent years, to have hold of our own identity. We’re not trying to be equal to men in a dysfunctional world. Most women – I call it feminine co-creator – are inspired by a creative impulse to give birth to that authentic self. A gift which is beyond having children is giving birth to a greater self.
So women, over the age of 50 in particularly, are a liberated species. Nobody is expecting much of them now. And suddenly – I’m 83 – and I’ve said ‘yes’ to the inner impulse to express; so it has said ‘yes’ to me in return, and it gives me more energy and more vitality.
Now with men, the same thing happens but it’s tricky. Men, if they go from their masculine-self can be aiming at power, domination and control, simply because they’re good at that. And the whole dominative culture, whether it be the top of global corporations or nation states or religions, is headed by masculine energy.
So, for a man to become a masculine co-creator takes a real shift of saying ‘no’ to certain structures of power. The structures of domination are very tempting; more tempting to the man than to the woman. So men have a greater challenge to express their own creatively and forcefully in the world, without getting sidelined by power structures.
And the good news is that many of the power structures are failing… failing to fulfill themselves at the top. In the United States, the top of our so-called liberal democracy is paralyzed by opposition. At the top of the Vatican, you see almost a self-obsolescing tendency of making decisions that are not truly in alignment with their purpose. You can see it in global corporations that are trying to control, but instead they lead the destruction of the environment.
The male dominator structure is getting a lot of feedback that shows it doesn’t work as well as it did. That feedback gives men a real opportunity to use their creative genius in a new way, one that is for evolutionary purposes.
And men’s genius is in what? In creating, in engineering, in logic?
I think – although certainly women have it too – that men are good at bringing things into form, whether it be logically or architecturally. In other words, it seems to be a masculine gift. Some women have it too; still when you think of the great geniuses bringing matter into form, bringing consciousness into form, you will think of men, whereas the women’s greater genius perhaps is consciousness itself.
All women I know love to work with co-creative men, so it’s not in opposition to the male; in fact it’s in love with the co-creative male. You know, it’s just wonderful.
Gil Dekel: Do you think that each one of us invents themselves?
Barbara Marx Hubbard: I would use the word ‘discover’ rather than ‘invent.’ It seems like everyone has a unique DNA or a genetic code. Everyone has a unique genius code of creativity. The goal is to be attuned to the uniqueness; and then you have to cultivate it by saying ‘yes’ to it, so there’s a lot of voluntary work there. I don’t think you make up this uniqueness. I think it’s a given just as our genetic code is.
So, we are born with it?
Yes, we are born with unique creativity. The culture around us can either nurture it or not. Most cultures in the past did not nurture anything like creativity in people. Even recently (when I went to College in 1947 – 48), there was a huge number of courses. You were asked: ‘What do you want to major in?’ – but there was no question of what is your deeper vocation, where is your calling, what might be useful, where is the world going? I feel that most education doesn’t ask these important questions. This really has to be done by people themselves.
Absolutely. And you are encouraging a new system, a new cultural coherence through the ‘synergy engine’ idea.
Yes.
Why would you think the synergy engine be most effective online? I’m thinking 100 years from now… the internet will be old news then…
What do you think will replace the internet?
I am not sure; my so-called ‘angel’ was talking about our technologies in general. He said that our digital cameras, for example, are limited not just by technology but by the way we approach and understand our own powers. In effect you can transmit images mind to mind, so he says.
Yes. Well, there’s a lot of truth to that. I think we’re at a phase of something like a newborn baby’s nervous system. It’s really important that this baby can coordinate enough to breathe and nurse and eliminate, but that’s not the whole purpose of the baby. After a while, the nervous system is more or less taken for granted, but there’s so much more to it that we can use.
I think we’ve been given a planetary nervous system for a reason. Right now, we’re like an infantile planetary species. We’re very new at being responsible for our own evolution. We’re very new at feeling we could destroy our life support system or create a new world. There are no experts on this.
Model of The Wheel Co-Creation:
The synergy engine (which is really just a concept that was developed by myself, Darrel Layham, Claudia Wells and others) suggests to find a way in which each person would be able to express their own desire to create, their own needs and resources, and start matching needs and resources and common goals, on a global scale. It’s the next stage of self-governance. Right now, liberal democracy whether in the United States or Egypt, where people are trying to come together in a liberal structure, is actually not working.
A synergistic democracy is a common goal, and if we can match needs with resources, we can bring synergistic rules of order.
So, the idea of the synergy engine is to create a global pool, an online global database, which will have an engine that matches people’s skills, with other people’s needs.
Yes. I think we’re moving towards a synergistic form of self-governance that right now does need a nervous system to connect people.
It’s already true that our intuitions connect very rapidly. And what if we are ourselves members of a living system, like the cells are in our body? It’s hard to even imagine the connectivity and co-creativity of this one species on this planet. It’s awesome.
The Horizon Unseen Self
I was ‘told’ once in a meditation that the atoms in the human body are unaware that together they make molecules… They don’t know that they combine together into molecules. Each atom ‘feels’ itself a separate individual…
There’s a new book out called ‘Radical Abundance’ by Eric Drexler. Eric is one of the inventors of nanotechnology, which is atomic, precise manufacturing. Nanotechnology purposefully engineers a construction piece from atoms, building molecules and cells. Eric says that you can make any object out of atoms because that’s what nature has done. If we can achieve this then it will lead to radical abundance without destroying the environment or taking away from anyone.
Now, if that’s true, and if it’s true that we might tap into zero point energy, which they say is infinite, then we can evolve into a higher consciousness, greater freedom and more complex synergistic order. If it’s true that we can develop new financial systems like complimentary currencies, you begin to feel a wonderful emerging world… It’s very exciting. We can then ask, “where am I going that I can give my gift into the emerging world, not the dying world? Where am I called to?”
So what is the difference between birthing and dying?
The line is actually fading. There’s a new book called ‘Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife’ by Eben Alexander. He had a serious disease, and also experiences of light bodies, old relatives and angelic presences. And then he ‘came’ back. But you know, near death experience is not death; rather it is a form of life. So, I think it’s near life experience…
When you are ‘almost’ dead and you’re starting to experience these beings of light and you go into your existing past mindset, you remember and share what you’ve already done. I wouldn’t be surprised that near death experiences are something we are having right now… a near species-death experience… Our species is saying ‘Oh, God, we could be extinct.’
The other thing is near new life experience, where we extend our sense of reality beyond the physical body into other realms. We may extend beyond the realm of the solar system and the galaxies where there are billions of planets. I feel we’re being born as a new universal species. This Planet, Mother Earth, is giving birth to a new species.
Gil Dekel: You had a spiritual experience in 1966.
Barbara Marx Hubbard: Yes, I did. I was asking the universe what story could we tell comparable to the story of the birth of Jesus? Whatever happened, that story was written down and has affected people’s lives throughout the world.
What story is ours to tell now? And with that, I became like an astronaut. I saw Earth as a living system that was struggling and was running out of energy. Then I felt empathy, spirituality, healing – and I saw all the various organs of capacity like health and education, which are symbolised in the image of the Wheel of Co-creation. Energy systems in a body connecting and coordinating; and we actually had a planetary birth experience in my expanded reality.
I felt how it feels when we connect. It was like a shared planetary mystical experience of a oneness of the impulse going through all of us, and we were attracting light. I believe the universe is filled with life but we won’t have shared experience with these life forms, until we ourselves are connected in a more mature way.
So, to connect to ‘higher beings’, we don’t need to look for them, but we first need to look for ourselves?…
Yes. We need to mature ourselves, connect ourselves. We have plenty of consciousness within us to connect with, and we need to learn to express it with others in a resonant field. We’re calling this the evolutionary movement. This is a new movement that is the movement of movements, because it’s in every field. It’s in health, media, science, technology.
How would you define this evolutionary movement?
It is a movement for experiencing the impulse pushing us to higher consciousness, to greater freedom and more synergistic cooperative order. If you get that sense of direction, it comes as a new story of creation; as the evolutionary story, which is a huge discovery. Only in the 1960s they began the study of Cosmogenesis, the study that the universe itself has been, and is now evolving.
Just now, from the 1960s, we are realizing that we’re facing crises, particularly in the environment, which can destroy us. And also now, from the 1960s, we get these huge new capacities in biotech, nanotech, computing.
With great power comes great responsibility…
Exactly. This is why conscious evolution, which is the world view that I’ve been discovering, is a world view for our optimal realization of spiritual, self and scientific potential.
But is that new? Have we not been in that stage in the far past?
I think a couple of things are really new. The understanding of Cosmogenesis as the way that the entire universe works and the scientific-based discovery pattern are new. None of the old Cosmologies had that from any of the past religions or thoughts.
Also new is the extent of the global crises. We’re now seeing that we could reach extinction of our own species. And then what’s also new are the capacities we have, which were used to be attributed to God in the past. All of this is 40 to 50 years in the making. And suddenly, in the last maybe 10 years, we realizing we’re at the threshold of that climate change and catastrophes. At the same time we have this threshold of consciousness connecting and breakthroughs.
For me personally, conscious evolution comes right in there. The simplest definition is evolution by choice, not chance. I don’t think we had this before.
And the synergy engine could facilitate this evolution?
It could because in a co-creative society we would look for common goals and match them with resources to fulfill the greater potential… This is the purpose of the synergy engine. A world in which everyone is creatively engaged. And I have a new Thomas Jefferson statement: “We hold these truths to be self-evident. All people are born creative… endowed by our creator with inalienable rights and responsibility to express our creativity for the good of ourselves and our whole family, community and earth.”
it’s obvious that all people are born creative than that all people are equal. We’re equal on a deeper spiritual source but equality at the social source is very rare; whereas the creativity is huge and it is showing up everywhere. And I think the internet is helping a lot, by the fact of us having wisdom of the entire world at our fingertips. I mean, anything anybody wants to know, that ever has been known before, we get in seconds. That’s extraordinary.
Why did you envision the wheel of co-creation as a wheel, a circle? Why not a sphere? A square?
I envisioned it as fitting into an eternal spiral. So a spiral is circular, but it’s always moving. And then I envisioned the impulse of evolution going through the hub of that wheel as a spiritual contact with source; but source as spirit in action. Source as impulse of creation. And then I saw that every sector of human endeavor is part of a whole. That we’re in a whole system breakdown but we’re also in a whole system breakthrough without the social architecture to be synergistic with each other. It’s very hard to synergize because we’re structured in silos.
So what the wheel does by identifying the spiritual centre there and then having all these different sectors, they’re organic functions. So let’s say you’re called to media and communication. Yes, you were in that sector but the whole point is that every other sector is connected with you because it’s a pattern of the whole, rather than separate disciplines and separate endeavors.
And if it really works, what would happen is there would be enough matching needs and resources that everyone would be further empowered to express their creative gift.
Gil Dekel: I think you once said that we all volunteered to come to planet earth…
Barbara Marx Hubbard: The question I asked was: do you remember having volunteered?
Gil: Wonderful question.
Barbara: Some people reply with a ‘yes’. They do remember.
Okay; do you remember, Barbara?
I do.
How was it?
I had a vision of it, of the Elysian fields, you know, with the Greek philosophers. And I was sitting on a ledge with a group of people. We were all ready to jump off together and come in for a shared purpose. One of the things I was told to do was ask people 5 questions to try to help us connect, so here are the questions:
1. do you remember having volunteered?
2. If so, what is your contract? Why did you come here?
3. what do you do best that really only you can do that well?
4. what do you most need to do it better?
5. who do you most need to meet in order to complete your destiny?
If you ask these questions to a group of people, what happens, you start to match needs and resources. And also, it has a mystical quality to it that we’re not just making this up superficially but that we have had a sense of destiny in coming here. I don’t know, do you feel that?
Absolutely. But you are lucky, because you had a clear vision of being in Greece. But for me it was complex.
So, do you remember?
Yes. I ‘remember’ this: just before ‘coming down’, God showed me planet earth and I told God: “You want me to go down to this dark place?” From Heavens, planet earth looks very dark. He told me, “Don’t worry, I will send you to a place where the sun is so bright, it will almost blind you, and you feel that there is abundant of light on earth.” and true to his words, he sent me to be born in Israel, where the sun is so bright – I could not look without blinking. That is why I moved to England…
Oh, really? Are you practicing Jewish or are you religious? What’s your own feeling there?
I’m not religious, I just believe in God…
Yeah, me too. I think that we’re transcending; religions were a phase of human evolution, to help hold a mystical sense of reality and nurture it. Now people like yourself and me don’t necessarily identify with a specific religion. We identify with God and with the direction of creation and ourselves in the story as co-creators. That’s the emerging mystical thing, I would say: the rising tide of humanity.
And within that new story can we find the garden of co-creation?
Yes! The garden of co-creation indeed. It’s the new garden and you know, this vision of the tree of life in the story of Genesis was that after Eve ate from the tree of knowledge, evidently she was heading for the tree of life because the Lord God said, “If they get to that, they’ll be like us; they’ll be like the gods.”
And the story of the expulsion from the garden in the old fashioned Genesis story is that we were aiming for the power of gods. Well, the fact is, we now have power that we used to attribute to God. We are at the tree of life.
So the new Adam and the new Eve would be the mature Adam as the incarnating spirit and the source, and the Eve would be incarnating that and joining together as co-creators to the tree of life, using the power of the gods to restore the earth, free the people, explore the universe. This is the moment.
But how are we allowed to have the powers of God (which we already have), if we don’t have the power to keep the earth healthy?…
Well, we won’t be. We will be destroyed. So it won’t last. If we don’t grow up and learn to harmonize with nature and with each other and use our power constructively and ethically, we will not survive as a species.
Nature is always selecting and making extinct that which does not work for its higher potential. So we could be selected again.
Nature is a fantastic system. It’s a miracle.
It reminds me a bit the mythological story of Atlantis: they had powers, only to destroy themselves.
Yes, that is one of the stories, and many people think that is what we’ll be doing because the power structure doesn’t change easily. And as the climate change global warming and all the related catastrophes grow… I just read a book called ‘The Great Disruption’ by Paul Gilding. Basically, he says this form of growth is not sustainable. So the power structure is based on this form of growth and billions of people have gained from it, including the Chinese and one billion people were brought out of poverty by economic growth. It’s very challenging. I was just in China at a global forum on ecological civilization. And there Irvin Laslow made the point that he thought the species had 5 years to make an internal conscious decision towards ecological civilization, or be a failed species. And that really stuck in my mind. Okay, 5 years. What if it’s possible to manifest a shift in 5 years? It has to be on the level of connection and consciousness; people by the hundreds and millions and billions of people have to connect.
What’s the purpose of fear in this process of evolution? Because fear inhibits our connection to one another.
Fear has several uses. On the one hand, it’s an emotion that helps you not keep your hand on a burning stove, so that you step out of the fire. It’s very useful for survival. However, if it gains hold of your consciousness and you’re always operating out of fear then your dominance and control goes out of control… And then we have these huge military budgets, especially in the United States – huge! We still have 1,200 nuclear bombs pointed at Russia and Russia at us, and we’re not enemies.
That’s the male ethic gone berserk. It’s actually insane, and nature will be taking action here.
Our job is to connect the people who are yearning to love the earth, free the people and co-create. So you know, I feel the force of evolution is on our side.
As long as the world is governed by men, we will make it to the moon. But once the world is governed by women, every single child in the planet will have a fresh glass of milk in the morning…
Yes. And when we join the co-creative masculine and the co-creative feminine, every child will have a glass of milk and will also go to the moon.
That’s nice. Well, it was lovely chatting with you.
Thank you so much, I enjoyed it.
=
Evolution by Choice, Not Chance Barbara Marx Hubbard
Evolution is evolving from unconscious chance to conscious choice. We are entering the first Age of Conscious Evolution. Why? Because we obviously affect our own evolution by all the choices we make—from the food we eat, the number of babies we have, the cars we drive, and the weapons we build.
Humans have no experience at being responsible for global change at this level. We are facing the possibility of the collapse of our life-support system, or, I believe, the emergence of something new, something better than we have ever known before. This shift in evolution began overtly in 1945 when the United States dropped the first atomic bombs on Japan. The signal went out to the world: We now have the power to destroy life on Earth. I was fifteen years old.
I could see at that time that self-conscious humans, in top-down competitive structures such as nation states, organized religion, and global corporations, could not handle this degree of power. We had suddenly gained capacities we used to attribute to our gods. We can blow up worlds, and we can build new worlds in space. We can travel with the speed of light by image; we can create new life forms or destroy our life; we can tap into immense energy or run out of energy.
I began to ask a great question: What is the meaning of our new powers in science and technology that are good and what are positive images of the future that are equal to our new powers?
I read religion and philosophy as a young girl and found that no one knew the answer. The powers were so new. I went to Bryn Mawr College and found I could not even ask the question there. There were no subjects on it. My father used to say to me, “Barbara, you are the best in the field…but there is no field!”
I went to Paris in 1947 to study at the Ecole des Sciences Politiques. Despair and a sense of the absurdity of life were rampant in Paris after two world wars and the bomb. One day I was having lunch on the Left Bank, and a handsome American walked in and sat down next to me. I asked him my question: “What do you think is the meaning of this new power that is good?” He responded, “I am an artist, and I am seeking a new image of man commensurate with our powers to shape the future.”
The idea crossed my mind, “I’m going to marry you!” And I did. He told me that when a culture loses its story and its image of the future, it declines. We had clearly lost our story of progress, and the image of humans now portrayed in the arts and theater was of a disintegrating destructive force. Yet I had innate hope and had to find out what I was hopeful about.
I went to see President Eisenhower in 1952, just after he became president. My father was an old colleague of the President. I was taken into the Oval Office. He greeted me kindly: “What can I do for you, young lady?” “Mr. President,” I said, “I have a question: What do you think is the meaning of all our new power that is good?” He looked startled, shook his head and said, “I have no idea.”
So it flashed in my mind, “Well, we better find out!” This has been my life quest, and I believe that just now we are discovering the proper response.
We do have a new story. It is the Universe Story. When we place ourselves IN this 13.7 billion-year universe story, we discover the pattern and an evolutionary process of action that we CAN DO.
We see that our crises are comparable to past evolutionary shift points. The only difference is now we are conscious that we are causing our own extinction. This is what I call “conscious evolution”—the greatest wake-up call we have ever had for the human species to grow up!
Here are some lessons we can learn and apply to our own situation. Problems are evolutionary drivers.
Crises Precede Transformation
Evolution takes jumps through greater synergy: separate parts coming together to form a new whole greater than and different from the sum of its parts.
Evolution creates radical newness. Once there was no Earth, then Earth appeared. Once there was no life, and life appeared.
Evolution raises consciousness and freedom through more complex order. According to Teilhard de Chardin, the great philosopher, the “noosphere,” the mind sphere or the thinking layer of Earth, with all our Internet and global intelligence, is about “to get its collective eyes.” We are about to connect center with center and heart with heart.
Empathy is rising. Spirituality is growing. Healings are happening. The Internet is connecting us everywhere. A “Wheel of Co-creation” is forming in every field and function: innovations in health, education, energy, conscious business, and environmental awareness are accelerating and beginning to connect—a whole system breakthrough out of the whole system breakdown.
We need one more conscious effort to connect the positive to make the shift in time—to midwife our own birth toward the next stage of our evolution. We may be one fraction of an evolutionary second from either connecting what is creative and loving and innovative, or devolution and extinction. This situation is dangerous…yet natural.
What do we need to do right now?
I believe it is time to rapidly connect what is working in every field and function and communicate through all media as fast as we can our creativity, innovations, and capacities to make it through together. We should be calling upon each other—everyone on Earth—to know that they have a part in this “birth.” Each of us is given an impulse of evolution within, a heart’s desire to realize our greater potential. Wherever we are, whatever our situation, we are capable of “giving a gift to the shift,” from one phase of evolution to the next.
For more information, go to www.evolve.org.
==
BRAVE NEW WORLD: Jacques Attali – International Banker, Eugenicist & Senior Governmental Advisors Dystopian Future
Source – sagaciousnewsnetwork.com
“….Other weapons — chemical, biological, bacteriological, electronic, and nanotechnological — will then appear…. Chemical arms will be capable of seeking out and killing leaders without being detected; pandemics could be ready for unleashing at will; complex genetic arms may one day be directed specifically against certain ethnic groups…the chief weapons of the future will be the instruments of propaganda, communication, and intimidation.”
SM:...As with the lovable Henry Kissinger, Jacques Attali gives you that same warm & fuzzy feeling every-time he speaks….
Globalist Banker Predicted Scamdemic & Genocide of The Useless
(The Bernician) For those who still doubt that the fraudulent, genocidal, Communist-style tyranny of COVID-1984 was planned long ago by the self-appointed Riders of the Pale Horse, as the unnatural denouement of their reprehensible facilitation of Big Pharma Bolshevik Coups in almost every nation worldwide becomes all the more pervasively obvious, prepare to have any remaining illusions shattered.
The following statements, which were made in 1981 by powerful international banker and unapologetic eugenicist, Jacques Attali, are taken from Interviews with Michel Salomon – The Faces of the Future, Seghers edition, which was published in France by Emi Lit when Attali was a senior adviser to French President, Francoise Mitterand:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.
Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.
Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.
We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”
The Weapons of Hyperconflict
Twenty five years later in 2006, Attali’s best-selling book, A Brief History of the Future – A Brave and Controversial Look at the 21st Century, was published in France.
It was then released by Arcade Publishing in the US, with a review by the Rothschild Cartel’s long-serving globalist henchman, Henry Kissinger, on the front cover, stating that the international banker’s book was “brilliant and provocative”.
As if the glowing endorsement of a man who has been charged with genocide on three continents isn’t enough to set off the alarm bells that toll for crimes against humanity, here is what Attali wrote in a chapter of the book called The Weapons of Hyperconflict:
“In all ages, the outcome of wars has been decided by possession of new arms and by the price attached by each belligerent to the lives of its own soldiers. In their time, the archers at the battle of Crécy, the tanks of the First World War, and the atomic weapons of the Second World War decided the fate of battles.
In all ages, new weapons have appeared, at once the products and the midwives of civilian technologies: the propeller was born with the lever, rearms with mechanization, tanks with the automobile. Inversely, it was in the armed forces that the telegraph, the radio, energy, the nuclear weapon, and the Internet were born alongside many other technological innovations.
In the next fifty years, new technologies will be developed by armies before being used on the civilian market. For defense or police needs, governments will finance the research needed for perfection of the technologies of hypersurveillance and selfsurveillance. Inversely, these technologies will then have civil applications.
In fact, these future weapons will essentially be founded on the concept of surveillance. Armies will at once develop digital infrastructures of nomadic ubiquity, surveillance systems for suspect movements, the means of protecting strategic installations, and a network of economic intelligence. Robots (concealed in enemy territory) and drones (flying robots) will relay data, detect chemical or biological agents, and serve as scouts ahead of infantry detachments faced with mined areas or blind spots. Software simulating battle will be permanently updated as close as possible to the battlefields.
Furthermore, new combat units will be integrated with the means of simulation, surveillance, and striking. New networks and instruments of nomadic ubiquity will allow combatants to stay connected and simulate every kind of situation. Intelligent clothing will serve to manufacture new uniforms; new materials will make it possible to design new shields. Three-dimensional simulation technologies will help prepare and carry out combat missions, while robots will work as substitutes for real fighters.
Electronic systems (e-bombs) will be able to destroy communications grids and leave an opposing force blind and deaf.
Marines will play a new part in the fight against trackers, in emigration surveillance, and in the protection of strategic straits. Fighter aircraft will no longer be as useful as today, and will lose their influence over staff thinking and military budgets.
New, so-called conventional weapons will be all the more necessary as unconventional weapons (nuclear and other) become more and more widely disseminated.
[…] By 2040 or 2050, a total of more than fifteen countries will openly possess nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them.
Shortage of oil will also impel the most diverse countries toward the production of civil nuclear power stations. This will lead them to use recycled wastes, known as MOX, for fuel — further multiplying the risks of proliferation and also of “disappearance” of wastes (during the transfer of these radioactive materials). Such wastes could then be used to manufacture radiological weapons mingling nuclear wastes and conventional explosives.
Other weapons — chemical, biological, bacteriological, electronic, and nanotechnological — will then appear. As with the new civil technologies they will prefigure, scientists will strive to increase their power, their miniaturization, and their accuracy. Chemical arms will be capable of seeking out and killing leaders without being detected; pandemics could be ready for unleashing at will; complex genetic arms may one day be directed specifically against certain ethnic groups.
Nanorobots as small as a mote of dust, known as gray jelly, could carry out stealth surveillance missions and attack the cells of enemy bodies. Then, once animal cloning techniques have progressed, cloned animals could well carry out missions — living animal bombs, monsters out of nightmare.
These weapons will not be developed solely in the military laboratories of powerful countries but also by big businesses, “circus businesses,” which will find new markets for them. As always, armaments will remain at the heart of the industrial apparatus, and until super-empire is here, public markets will be essentially oriented toward the armaments sector. Big insurance firms and mercenary companies will then pick up the torch.
Most of these weapons will be accessible to small nations, to nonstates, to corsairs, to pirates, mercenaries, maquisards, mafias, terrorists, and every kind of tracker. In the not distant future, for example, it will be possible to make an e-bomb for $400 from a condenser, a reel of copper wire, and an explosive. Chemical, radiological, and biological weapons will thus be affordable to everyone. Killing more and more people with rudimentary means will become a sad possibility. In cities and on mass transport, crowding will multiply the effectiveness of the most primitive weapons.
Finally (and perhaps especially), since no war can be won unless the peoples waging it believe it just and necessary, and unless the loyalty of citizens and their belief in its values are maintained, the chief weapons of the future will be the instruments of propaganda, communication, and intimidation.”
Genocide Unleashed
Given that Attali’s mind-blowingly amoral rhetoric echoes that of every other outspoken eugenicist over the past 150 years, the forgoing passages cannot be set aside as either conjecture or conspiracy theory.
However, on the basis that he predicted in 1981 that there would be genocidal culling of the over 60’s, the weak and the stupid, the catalyst for which would be finding or manufacturing a viral pandemic, the following statement is all the more conspicuous: “pandemics could be ready for unleashing at will”.
As is the final sentence quoted, which confirms that the chief weapons of the long-planned war against the People are “the instruments of propaganda, communication and intimidation.” The parallels between Attali’s predictions of such genocides being unleashed in the 21st century and the events of COVID-1984 are chillingly striking.
Nevertheless, without the majority of the public believing blatant government lies about a ‘virus’ which has never been isolated or purified, the censorship of opposing views and the erection of a police state would have proven impossible.
It naturally follows that when the majority rejects the fraudulent narrative, opposing views, censored or not, will become the norm and the police state can then be systematically deconstructed with totalitarian non-compliance to every tyrannical rogue government diktat and the criminal prosecution of all those charged with crimes against humanity
https://sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/globalist-banker-predicted-scamdemic-genocide-of-the-useless/