The Jews and Their Statist Clowns Are Destroying Humanity and Liberty and Everyone Is Cowardly and Stupidly Cheering On!
While waiting for the coming very good news, which by the way, would be the bad news for the West in general and the Jewish-A/Five Eyes in particular… I am again going out on a limb to say that the seppos are having a big gaslighting ever and a big slap and spit on their face by the Jews via their koshered orange clown. What I am going to say will make dumbshit Maga and nationalists grind their teeth but… DILLIGAF!
This orange clown has been a Jewish project even before he officially entered the selection!
F. William Engdahl was right about this as he emphatically warned "Trump is a Project" at the beginning, except he was wrong for he did not know and not call out the clown is the “Jewish project!”
F. William Engdahl "Trump is a Project"
I smelt the unmistakably “chosen rats project” when this criminal orange clown made a “pledge” to his masters at AIPAC conference, (a prerequisite that a future Jewish-A leader must come and grovel to be “blessed” and “selected”) to move the US embassy to Jerusalem as a way to recognize Jerusalem is the Jewish State Capital city. This grovelling stupid act broke an unwritten international agreement on Jerusalem that the holy city must be remained the “international holy city” . Later the koshered Putin-Russia “recognized” this “legitimacy” and replaced “Tel Aviv” with “West Jerusalem!”
Here are some of those I wrote and reported back then:
For 4 years, the brainless Biden took over the Jewish servant job of serving the Jewish in emptying out the Ukraine and the genocide of Palestinians. And now, the last phrase of the Jewish criminal clown project has begun!
This time will be much worse! Because this Jewish clown will take his last chance to go all-in with full speed for the Jewish grand plan as he has been prepared for, and at the same time enriching his family, his Jewish daughter and Jewish son in law as he did during his first 4 year!
This time with a team of Jewish technocrats and operators the USA with its military might will be deployed to not only to subvert and subdue the people in the Middle East/Palestine but more importantly this Jewish clown will destroy the last remained liberty principle in and off the USA. And the Jews will become untouchable gods of the land… Non-Jew Americans will become… whoever/whatever you can think of but free people!
Why have the seppos not realized that their whole USA national political structure has been controlled and run completely by the Jews? Whether the brainless Calama “Curry” or the stupid orange Clown , red or blue etc will make no difference! Both are koshered anyway!
At least there is an (self-misidentified Jewish) American who has seen this:
How could even well-experienced and knowledgeable people fall for this criminal Jewish clown?
Have they ever asked themselves HOW a criminal clown who will obey everything the evil Jews ask be “national savior” of “American First” and “Make America Great Again?” How could they swallow such “mother of all oxymoron?” Do these Americans still have a thing called brain any more?
PLEASE, MARK MY WORDS right here! This Jewish clown being “assisted” by a bunch of Koshered and Jewish technocrats will be ushering the next level of digitalized surveillance and “virus vaxx” on Americans in accordance with the “global grand plan” (i.e 2030 agenda)
As many and I have warned since the “slow down” of “the lockdown” that the period of 2025 -2030 will be the destructive phase that will destroy the remained liberty and human dignity!
The worst thing is both of Christian West and Islam East have become dumbed-down and so cowardly in facing the genocidal Jews.
Have a quick look at Russian vs Ukrainian:
How could these christian Slavs not realize that they have been used and culled by the Jews? How could they keep going to the fratricidal meat grinder for the Jews like a bunch of brainless zombies?
And look at the Islamic world!
After one year of Genocide of Palestinian and now the Lebanese! That's all these “Islamic leaders” can do while many of them still keep doing business with the Jews?
What a bunch of fucking cowards!
Have these cowards seen enough of what the terrorist Jews have been genociding in Gaza and Lebanon? Have these cowards seen enough of what the so-called United Nation/UNSC and the so-called international community have done to stop the on-going genocide?
Have these cowards seen Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis are fighting back to stop the genocide?
Don’t these stupid cowards understand that the evil Jews will kill them all the same in the end?
Even inside the West, the Muslim “leaders” are a bunch of cowards. They prioritize appeasing the West rather than focusing on true effort of exposing the real Jewish crimes:
Folks, while waiting for the “coming very good news”, this Sunday afternoon (10-Nov-2024) , I made a quick visit to the FPP to see if there is any improvement!
The reason I have been waiting for my “good news” are all of these above! We, this humand kind, need such good news badly in order to confront the evil from within!
It’s me folks. That’s the way I see the current situation of the world.
As always, the last word is yours.
APPENDIX
WTF Do People Expect From The Clown in Tweet? A Wet statist dream!
Not only have the dumbshit Joes and Maries in the West been played by the Jewish controlled Cabal but also all those so-called intellectuals, who supposed to know better. Very few true intellectuals like F William Engdahl, who still has the ability of seeing through all the democratic selection shows scripted out by the Cabal (oligarchs). Even the most supposed experienced and intelligent individuals such as the Saker and Paul Craig Roberts have fallen into the trap. These experienced and intelligent persons have not only failed to grasp the reality which is unraveling but become such foolish ass-kissers as to put their “noble hope” on the shoulders of a loudmouthed criminal stupid clown.. and keep defending the clown and keep hoping despise all happening. They even sneer and belittle whomever rightly or wrongly criticizing the clown!
All because they rightly despise the “Neocons’ puppets Killary” and fear the Nuke War with Russia. However, inadvertently and effectively they promote the argument that it’s OK -the clown can do any stupid thing domestically, can say any crazy thing internationally as long as he goes along and has no nuke confrontation with Russia! He, the clown alone, has the noble will and brain-power to defy the “Evil Industry Complex” and fix all the ills of American society and its corrupt political system! What a superman the clown must have been! What a dream!
These “experienced and intelligent” persons brush off the fact that their beloved “clown in tweet” is no where near J.F.Kennedy, who did tried to defy the Cabal and ended up in Grassy Knoll with his brain out in broad daylight and in front not only of “we the people” but of the whole world to watch! The broad daylight execution of J.F Kennedy was the warning example and later that of his brother R.J.Kennedy was an affirmation. THEY did not hide , THEY did not bluff, but made their statement clearly: We, the Jewish controlled Cabal, are afraid of nothing and fear no one! We OWN your society, your system!
Worse than any other statist system, the American social and political system are rotten to the core, it continues to cause destruction, democide at home and abroad. But the usa! usa! usa! chanting is gaining more rhythm and getting louder and louder. This is exactly what their project is all about and the role the clown has been performed.
Here are what F William Engdahl has to say about the role that the criminal clown has been assigned to play:
Read and listen to all these assessments and decide for yourselves!
PQC
================
Has the Pentagon Taken Over US Foreign Policy in Afghanistan?
Transcript
PAUL JAY: Welcome to The Real News Live. We’re continuing our discussion, an analysis of the new policy, I should put quotation marks around “new,” I don’t think most of it’s new, of the US foreign policy, military policy in Afghanistan that was announced by President Trump a few days ago.
So much attention has been on Donald Trump the man, especially after his speech in Phoenix. Is he fit for office and so on. This policy has been attributed to Trump. Steve Bannon and Breitbart News have been denouncing this new Afghan policy. But I think it seems rather clear that the policy in Afghanistan is on the whole being directed by the Pentagon. I think that’s the case with Trump. I think it would be the case if there was a President Pence, and I doubt it would be all that much different if there was a President Clinton, but I guess that’s a matter of some speculation.
We’re going to take a look at again some of the pieces of the speech that Trump made when he announced this policy, and we’re going to have a broader conversation about the consequences and possible outcomes of this policy, and it’s all rather dangerous. I was just saying to our guest before we started, and our guest, as you may know, is Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, that when you do the analysis of this whole thing it scares the bejesus out of you because this is filled with great danger, and the mainstream media’s blabbering on about Trump this and Trump that. In so many areas of life, so many areas of government, dangerous things are happening, but this foreign policy gambit is fraught with danger to the level of nuclear danger, and there’s practically no conversation going about this on mainstream media. But anyway, we’re not mainstream media.
So now joining us is our guest from Falls Church, Virginia, Larry Wilkerson. Larry is a former chief of staff for US Secretary of State Colin Powell and currently an adjunct professor of government at the College of William & Mary and a regular on The Real News Network. Thanks for joining us, Larry.
LARRY WILKERSON: Thanks for having me, Paul.
PAUL JAY: Let me ask this first question, and then we’ll start getting into bits of the speech. Everyone who’s watching, we will be taking questions later on, so if you want to start sending your questions in, you can do it on Facebook comments, on YouTube comments, or at The Real News comments because we’re live on all those platforms at the same time.
It seems to me that while Obama went along with the overriding or underlying assumptions of US foreign policy, meaning the United States must remain the hegemon, there was some pushback from the Obama administration on what to do in Iraq, what to do in Afghanistan. You could say there was a push-pull there, but civilian administration at least had some of its own mind and agenda about this. This Afghan policy seems to be, and also given that Trump has surrounded himself with generals, that the Pentagon’s really taken over the policy in Afghanistan and perhaps other places. What do you make of that idea?
LARRY WILKERSON: Paul, I saw this same thing happen with the Bush administration post-9/11, perhaps more understandably so given the impact of 9/11 on the American people. He turned essentially Afghanistan and then Iraq over to the generals, over to Secretary Rumsfeld in particular in terms of civilian control, and of course you always had Dick Cheney looking over their shoulders. But basically, the generals were running it. And we saw what happened there.
What we just saw in Afghanistan is an illustration of 5,000 years of military history’s most egregious mistake by military commanders generals, admirals of the fleet, and so forth and that is to reinforce strategic failure. That is the first desire of military officers in the field when they’re losing is to say, “Give me more troops, and I will win.” Rarely do they win. What they do is they commit that incredible error of reinforcing strategic failure and thus deepening that failure. So we can have every expectation that with the Pentagon running Afghanistan, and for that matter everything else we’re doing right now militarily, we will deepen the failure, and we’ll be even in worse trouble than we are now.
PAUL JAY: When we say the Pentagon running things, and while I’m quite persuaded there are some very serious people in the Pentagon who are doing their best, and while I don’t agree with their frame of reference and underlying assumptions, I think there’s some serious honest people in the military leadership who are concerned about the fate of the world and so on. But there’s a whole lot of people in the Pentagon that are just waiting to get into Lockheed Martin and Boeing and are just waiting to cash in on this bonanza of money that’s hitting the industrial-military complex. So when we’re saying Pentagon’s running the policy, it also means the military-industrial complex is running that policy. Do you agree with that?
LARRY WILKERSON: I do agree with that to a certain extent and particularly for the high-level civilians in the Pentagon and the high-level starred individuals, that is the admirals and the generals. That is an underlying if not an overwhelming motivation for some of them now as they go out the revolving door and get six- and seven-figure salaries with Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others.
I go back to your comment about the sincere people in the Pentagon. I don’t dispute that a bit. I was one of them. I will say this, though. The professional predilection of military … Remember, I was one for 31 years, schooled, educated, and trained, and experienced to be one. The professional predilection is to keep the war going, not to end it because that’s where you get your rank, that’s where you get your progression, your notoriety, your fame, your fortune, and so forth. So it hasn’t changed in 5,000 years, Paul. It’s just gotten a little more sophisticated. That’s where you make yourself. So there is this professional predilection for war. It can be selective, and with Mattis and McMaster and Kelly, it will be selective because they don’t want to break the bank as it were. But it will still be a predilection for war.
In the White House while Obama was still president, I sat in front of him and Secretary Kerry, and President Obama said to me that he had learned something while he had been in the White House. His sentence was this, and I quote it directly, “There is a bias in this town towards war.” That president had figured it out, and at that moment in his administration was fighting, fighting hard not to put troops on the ground seriously in Syria. Well, it took him a long time to figure that out, but he figured it out. This president has no inclination whatsoever to even attempt to figure that out. He’s turned it all over to those people who have a predilection, a professional predilection for war.
PAUL JAY: And I think he has himself, and not only him, I think most presidents … I do think Obama was somewhat the exception, although he made plenty of war himself. But given the situation he was in, he did mitigate it some. I had a chance to get to know Gore Vidal pretty well, and Gore told me … And Gore knew John F. Kennedy pretty well. He was in and out of the White House because he and Jackie Kennedy shared a step-father I believe it was. I asked him why did Kennedy go into Vietnam, and he said it was everyone remembers a wartime president. Nobody remembers one who’s not. This predilection for war is very deep and of course very deep in the economy. The whole economy is so militarized.
A lot of talk’s been about how Trump, as he said himself, is non-interventionist and he was against the Iraq War, which really wasn’t true. But it was very clear how in favor he was of an intervention in Libya, which gives you a better sense of his mindset. So here’s what he said at the time of the intervention in Libya.
DONALD TRUMP: We should do on a humanitarian basis immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively and save the lives. After it’s all done, we go to the protestors who end up running the country. They’re going to like us a lot better than they will if we don’t do it. More importantly, we’re going to save lives, and we should then say, “By the way, from all of your oil, we want reimbursement.”
PAUL JAY: There’s actually a little more of that clip. Do you have it? He actually says in that clip we have troops all over the region, and we should bring them all to Libya. So it’s not like Trump is this big interventionist, so he is handing things over to the guys with a predilection for war, a whole militarized economy with a predilection for war. So it’s pretty damn dangerous, Larry.
LARRY WILKERSON: I don’t disagree. I don’t disagree at all, and I think it’s been very dangerous ever since Eisenhower left the White House. It’s gotten worse and worse and worse. Of course, Vietnam was its first manifestation. Ten years of bloody war, millions of casualties on the Vietnamese side, hundreds of thousands on our side, and nothing, absolutely nothing. Vietnam today is far better off with what it had in the beginning, and had we not intervened it would have probably reached the state its reached today but without such things as thousands of casualties from landmines and unexploded ordinance and so forth and so on. So Vietnam was a total waste of time and effort, blood and treasure on both sides, and yet we did it. And Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria and all the rest of this mess that looks like it could blossom at any moment, it’s all from the same warp and woof of the national security state, which you might as well call a warfare state.
PAUL JAY: Right. Okay, let’s take a look at some of the speech he gave on the Afghan strategy and talk about some sections of it. We’re going to play clip number one, guys. You can roll it.
DONALD TRUMP: A core pillar of our new strategy is a shift from a time-based approach to one based on conditions. I’ve said it many times how counterproductive it is for the United States to announce in advance the dates we intend to begin or end military options. We will not talk about numbers of troops or our plans for further military activities. Conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables will guide our strategy from now on. America’s enemies must never know our plans or believe they can wait us out. I will not say when we are going to attack, but attack we will.
PAUL JAY: I was reading some of the Pakistani press, not that I speak the language, but some of the newspapers are in English, and this whole thing’s kind of a joke that the enemies can never know our plans or believe they can wait us out. Of course they know they can wait us out. All the Pakistani press I read are all saying everyone knows eventually the United States has to leave, and everyone knows the Taliban forces are going to still be there. So saying they can’t wait us out and pretending as if you’re not going to let people your actions, it’s kind of silly. I guess it’s for a domestic audience that doesn’t know the situation, Larry.
LARRY WILKERSON: I think that’s part of it. It’s for an apathetic and no-skin-in-the-game audience, so why should they care? And it titillates his base, which is growing smaller every day, so they shouldn’t care either. Let me just say one thing, though. I’ve been saying for a long time that I think the Pentagon, and the Pentagon is the only strategic think tank in the United States, period. No one else thinks strategically. They do. They think that way with a military orientation, but they nonetheless think strategically. I’ve been saying for a long time, and this defies what you just intimated that we have to leave, that we won’t leave, that what we’re seeing right now is a beginning of the new Great Game, that it involves China, it involves Russia, and it involves the United States, and all those people who get in the way in Central Asia.
The United States will probably be in Afghanistan, I’ve said repeatedly, for the next 50-plus years because it is the only place geographically speaking in that region from which the United States with military power, hard power can affect China’s OBOR, its One Belt One Road excursion through the old Silk Road into the soft underbelly of Europe, if you will, and to economically supplant both Russia and the United States in terms of supplying key commodities and oil and gas and so forth to Europe, those 400 million people who can afford to buy it. So this is a new game, and I don’t for a moment think that the smarter strategic thinkers in the Pentagon don’t see the outlines of this game and aren’t ready to stay in Afghanistan as we’ve stayed in Germany and in Korea and in Japan for a half a century or longer, and it has nothing to do with terrorism.
Secondarily, they are right next door to the most dangerous nuclear situation in the world, that between Pakistan and India, and they are right next door to the most dangerous component of that formula, Pakistan. So being there where you can move swiftly and with major hard power to corral as it were Pakistan’s nuclear weapons should they suddenly become, let’s say, dangerous to the extent that we had to do that, that’s a very important strategic objective, too. So not for a moment do I not think that the generals in the Pentagon are thinking that way.
PAUL JAY: So part of this strategy … And I agree with what you just said. I guess I would just caveat what I had said that I think the Taliban believe they can outwait them.
LARRY WILKERSON: Yes, absolutely.
PAUL JAY: But I think what you’re saying-
LARRY WILKERSON: Just as the Vietnamese did.
PAUL JAY: Yeah. But I think you’re quite right. There’s no plans to get out, and this is the policy of forcing the Taliban into negotiations and supposedly winning this in a honorable, enduring way. It’s all a bunch of rhetoric. I think what you said is the real strategy. But part of this strategy, and maybe this is something that’s new in the strategy, at least the way it’s being articulated, is actually openly inviting India to come into Pakistan. And this is clip number four, guys. This is a threat to Pakistan and then an invitation to India. So start with four.
DONALD TRUMP: The next pillar of our new strategy is to change the approach and how to deal with Pakistan. We can no longer be silent about Pakistan’s safe havens for terrorist organizations, the Taliban and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond. Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan. It has much to lose by continuing to harbor criminals and terrorists. In the past, Pakistan has been a valued partner. Our militaries have worked together against common enemies. The Pakistani people have suffered greatly from terrorism and extremism. We recognize those contributions and those sacrifices, but Pakistan has also sheltered the same organizations that try every single day to kill our people. We have been paying Pakistan billions and billions of dollars at the same time they are housing the very terrorists that we are fighting. But that will have to change, and that will change immediately.
PAUL JAY: So it seems to me as much as I don’t agree with most of what Trump says about most things, what he’s saying here is accurate. Pakistan has been playing this kind of double role. Why did the Obama administration not be more forceful about Pakistan’s role in terms of supporting the Taliban and even elements of the Pakistani intelligence services, ISI and military, having even direct connections with al-Qaeda? Obama administration did say some things but nothing at the level of this, especially not threatening the military.
LARRY WILKERSON: With regard to Pakistan and its relationship with India and with the United States and with China, you go all the way back to Nixon, and you can find blame everywhere. Let’s look at the situation again from a strategic point of view. First of all, Pakistan is China’s ally as much as it is the US’ ally. From time to time, Pakistan loves to play this balance off and go heavier towards China or heavier towards Washington, whichever is conducive to its interests. Clearly understandable. It’s a state just like any other state.
Right now, you have a rather difficult situation on India’s eastern border up in the mountains by Bhutan where the Chinese and the Indians are facing each other at about 100-meter standoff with artillery wheel to wheel and other assets of military power tending to be in a place where their proximity alone might start something any moment. At the same time on the other side of India, if you will, on the western side, you have the Chinese having developed an economic corridor through Kashmir that looks a lot like it is tending towards Pakistan, which means that sort of says a statement, from China at least, tacitly, that maybe Kashmir ought to be Pakistan’s and not India’s. This is a casus belli for India, too.
So you’ve got a strategic situation developing right now that probably Trump is utterly ignorant of that’s extremely dangerous between two nuclear powers, and he’s pontificating about one of them and driving it even further into Beijing’s camp. So this is not a very smart thing to be doing. Again, we need to lift ourselves up above the terrorist issue, the Taliban issue. By the way, the Taliban has been just as ruthless with regard to Pakistan as they have Afghanistan. So that’s a crazy argument. It has some truth to it, but it has truth based on the ISS and incompetence more than it does a published secret policy.
PAUL JAY: But if we’re correct that this policy’s mostly driven by the Pentagon who, as you said, are really are most on the whole strategic thinkers, if this really isn’t Trump who’s ignorant, this is a policy that the Pentagon supports, one would assume. What’s their logic here except when you bring in how much the Pentagon is connected to the arms sales and manufacturers, this kind of volatility is great for business.
LARRY WILKERSON: Well, it is great for business, but I can see some reason to what they’re saying, and I have to assume they helped, McMaster in particular, write his speech. That’s not to say he adhered to their text. But what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to send signals to everyone simultaneously. To Delhi, to Islamabad, to Beijing, to Kabul and so forth. They’re not necessarily the most sophisticated signals, but then this is the military again, and they don’t write the best speeches in the world, let me tell you.
So we’ve got a strategic rationale that makes some sense. We’ve got some rhetoric that perhaps goes along with that rationale but doesn’t make all that much sense, particularly to people in the region who are trying to figure out exactly what the United States’ intent is. And in that regard, having this president is especially dangerous from that perspective right now because even our enemies don’t know where we’re going. They have no idea what our policies are. Our friends don’t know what our policies are. No one knows what our policies are because this president is as inconsistent as any who has ever sat in the Oval Office. And basically, his 144-character policies confuse everyone.
PAUL JAY: Again, to go back to where the Pentagon’s thinking is on this because as you said, this type of statement, while again I think is mostly correct in terms of the facts of it, it pushes Pakistan closer to China. And in fact, just hours after the Trump speech on Afghanistan, the Chinese Foreign Minister Yi offered his full support for Pakistan and praised Pakistan’s fight against terrorism, and then they have this apparently trilateral, some kind of commission or committee between Afghanistan and Pakistan, which China acts as a mediator. And the Pakistani foreign minister praised this committee and China’s role in it. If the ultimate objective here is to pushback on China, I don’t see how that accomplishes this. And then let me just play one more clip, and then we can talk about it. And then you add to that an invitation to India get even more involved in Afghanistan than it already is, which is the one thing that scares the hell out of Pakistan. So let’s play clip number five here, guys.
DONALD TRUMP: We appreciate India’s important contributions to stability in Afghanistan, but India makes billions of dollars in trade with the United States, and we want them to help us more with Afghanistan, especially in the area of economic assistance and development. We are committed to pursuing our shared objectives for peace and security in South Asia and the broader Indo-Pacific region.
PAUL JAY: I’ll go back to what I said earlier. I know it’s kind of banal and people will call it reductionist and simplistic, but boy, if you want to sell guns and big ships and big weapons, increase the tension between India and Pakistan and India and China. And I was reading in some of the military press that the bonanza people are expecting out of arms sales to India.
LARRY WILKERSON: I’m sure that’s probably true, especially with big defense contractors like Lockheed Martin who now have sort of sold out in Russia’s near abroad and sold out on the Korean Peninsula and so forth. There’s hardly anything else they can have that might seep to places. There are so many armaments now. But let’s back up for a moment and look at this from a clear thinking, which I think some of the people in the Pentagon are, military perspective, you’ve got an alliance with India. That’s clear. It’s particularly clear in the maritime services, India’s navy and the US Navy. In fact, I’ve had sailors tells me that the Atlantic is no longer a US priority. It’s now the Indian Ocean, and in that Indian Ocean, India is the principle ally. The navies work together every day, exercising and gaining inter-operability and so forth. This is all aimed ultimately, from Beijing’s perspective, at them, at Beijing.
PAUL JAY: Well, Obama called it the Asia pivot, specifically about China.
LARRY WILKERSON: Well, on the other side-
PAUL JAY: It wasn’t a secret.
LARRY WILKERSON: Yeah. On the other side of Beijing, you’ve got Tokyo and you’ve Seoul and you’ve got the DPRK perturbating that right now. In Pakistan, you’ve got a government whose leader just collapsed under the weight of the Supreme Court and the indictment against him. You’ve got a military that’s very reluctant to go back in and take over yet again, don’t want to at all, nor does the ISI. So you have a void in Islamabad right now in a real sense, but their tendency is to favor the giant next to them rather than the giant a long way away, which is opposite of the usual strategic rationale. And the reason for that is because the United States has handled Pakistan so badly, and the Chinese have moved into that void and handled it rather well.
And if you look at what’s coming down the road, trillions of dollars of development, economic and financial aid and so forth, offered by China with very few strings attached, were I Islamabad, I’d be looking in that direction, too, particularly when the only country in the world that really is going to help me against my main enemy, India now allied with the United States, is China. So this is the Great Game writ large, and frankly I don’t think we’re playing it very well right now. I’m not sure we should be playing it at all, frankly speaking.
PAUL JAY: And playing it with 19th century psychology practically. It’s the-
LARRY WILKERSON: Yeah, in many respects, but with 21st century kill-you-all-very-shortly weapons.
PAUL JAY: Right. There was one piece of that speech which I found a little peculiar, and I haven’t heard many people talk about it. This is clip number seven, guys, where he talks about economic development in Afghanistan is going to help defray the costs. Is this back to the Mexicans paying for the wall or is there more to this? Let’s play the clip.
DONALD TRUMP: In this struggle, the heaviest burden will continue to be borne by the people of Afghanistan and their courageous armed forces. As the prime minister of Afghanistan has promised, we are going to participate in economic development to help defray the cost of this war to us.
PAUL JAY: So what is it? He’s talking about mineral wealth in Afghanistan?
LARRY WILKERSON: This is what I’ve been hearing ever since we first went into Afghanistan in terms of future prospects, whether it be apricots, opium, copper, or you name it, whatever is … TAPI, the Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India contemplated pipeline and so forth and so on.
PAUL JAY: They also say that Afghanistan is the Saudi Arabia of lithium.
LARRY WILKERSON: I think it’s mostly nonsense, and I think it’s nonsense just as he just said about the ANA, the Afghan National Army, is nonsense. My God, Paul, the AWOL rates in the battalions of that army are 30 or 40%. It’s like the Iraqi Army. Remember? We spent billions and trained that Iraqi Army to where it was just great. It could secure its own country and its borders. And as soon as we left a couple of years later, ISIS went in and put them into flight and took all their equipment and gear and made it their own. The same thing would happen in Afghanistan. We can praise that army all day long. It doesn’t change the fact that you have Pashtuns and you have others, and you have a very difficult situation getting anyone motivated to lay down their life for a government in Kabul they consider to be not only illegitimate but utterly corrupt. So this is rhetoric, and the economic and financial rhetoric is just as hollow as the military rhetoric.
PAUL JAY: All right, I’m going to raise one more point from the speech, and then we’ll take some questions. So again, if you want to ask some questions, again, we’re live, Facebook, YouTube, therealnews.com. Just go into the comment sections and we’ll try to take some of your questions. I’m going to play a clip. We’ve numbered this clip eight, guys. But I only want to play the first part of it, which ends after “protect our shared interest.” So roll that.
DONALD TRUMP: But we will no longer use American military might to construct democracies in faraway lands or try to rebuild other countries in our own image. Those days are now over. Instead, we will work with allies and partners to protect our shared interest.
PAUL JAY: I know the rhetoric has been about democracies and so on and so on, but you look at the real practice of US intervention, at the very least since the Vietnam War and even before, this isn’t been about nation-building. This has been a policy of nation-destroying.
LARRY WILKERSON: What a farce those remarks were. One minute he’s threatening Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela with military intervention, the next minute he’s saying we don’t do that sort of thing, and the next minute, he’s saying we’re going to stay in Afghanistan with an unknown timetable, an unknown troop level and so forth. And we’re not going to build democracy there? Come on, Mr. Trump, get your act together. Either say the one or the other. Don’t say them both simultaneously.
PAUL JAY: Just let me add to the nation-building, we’re no longer going to nation-build. I was in Afghanistan, as I’ve mentioned before, making a film Return to Kandahar, which I think we’ll probably play over the weekend so people can watch it. We were there in the spring of 2002 for about six weeks. There was no nation-building going on there. They had handed all the relief projects over to Germany, Canada, some of the other NATO countries. On the whole, the Americans were just chasing Taliban around in the hills.
And then later, even when Obama called for this civilian surge because he made a quite correct statement saying that if you don’t deal with the conditions of poverty and health and lack of schools and so on, no military solution’s going to solve this. Well, he said that, except it never really was a civilian surge. One of the reasons for that is that they wouldn’t protect the civilian relief project, and nobody wanted to go and do them. I should say some very brave people did do, and many of them died.
LARRY WILKERSON: Paul, I will tell you that all of that is a product of what we started out with in 2001, too few troops. And as long as we have the all-volunteer force, no conscription, no draft, we will have too few troops. And you can send 200,000 contractors all day long, and they are not going to do the things that you just enumerated. They’re not going to secure a people who are trying to bring democracy, institution-building, rule of law, and so forth to an embattled people. They simply aren’t. So if we’re going to do these things, and I’m not for a moment advocating that we do them, we’re going to need a lot more troops.
PAUL JAY: Let me take issue a bit with that with Afghanistan. I think one, we know that Bush always just wanted to go into Iraq anyway and Afghanistan was just a way to get the ball rolling. Two, but at the time I was in Afghanistan, they didn’t need a lot more troops. In fact, the Taliban were really in disarray and in retreat. We filmed up and down the country. We had no protection. The only thing we needed was to avoid landmines because they were everywhere. If any actual intent on helping the people Afghanistan there was plenty of opportunity to do it and with enough troops they had. That was just never the agenda. It was always the rhetoric. Democracy was never the objective. In fact, if it was, you wouldn’t have put warlords into power who were almost entirely made up of war criminals.
Anyway, that’s a whole nother story. At another time, we’ll talk about this issue of volunteer versus a draft because you’ve made some very important points that if the children of some of the people making these decisions about war actually had to face the draft, it might have some effect on things.
By Timothy Fitzpatrick October 29, 2016 Anno Domini
Part I
Any inquisitive person should be asking themself why a seemingly anti-establishment candidate like Donald Trump has been allowed to get as far as he has in the U.S. presidential race for election November 8.
The simplest answer is that he isn’t anti-establishment and is only fronting a very convincing facade for public consumption.
The family-made rich man has been strategically propped up as the all-accommodating GOP extremist opponent of candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, herself part of the very same establishment and even personal friend to Trump—at least prior to the race.
The two candidates come from the same organized criminal syndicate that leads back to Israel, its murderous Mossad terrorist organization, and the Lansky international crime syndicate. Furthermore, as we shall see, Trump is nothing more than a puppet of Mossad and is likely under their control through opportunism and, darker yet, blackmail. What Trump and his cronies all share in common is sexual compromise and their loyalty to the international Judeo-masonic power structure.
Sexual blackmail and Illuminism
Perhaps the most powerful form of blackmail is that which involves sexual matters, and so it is that throughout human history, many men of power have been brought down upon revelation of some sexual scandal. It was through this channel that Adam Weishaupt’s illuminism (blackmail) was so successful in his time through to today (Weishaupt stole the Catholic sacrament of confession and used it for his own personal gain—so that he could gain knowledge of people’s sins in order to use it against them). Since then, it has proven to be the most useful form of blackmail employed, especially in the political world. Every person in a position of power should be suspected of being controlled through this form of blackmail, since the Judeo-masonic cryptocracy controls virtually every aspect of organized government, the press, and the financial system, to name a few. You may have heard of the bizarre sexual initiation of Yale University’s Skull and Bones secret society, where the would-be bonesman reveals his sexual secrets to his fellow initiates and initiators.[i] From the very start of their societal ascent, you could say, a bonesman is blackmailed and falls under control of the society.
Former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky revealed in his first tell-all book about the Mossad:
“… there are three major “hooks” for recruiting people: money; emotion, be it revenge or ideology; and sex.”[ii]
This scenario is played out in virtually every sphere of influence at one degree (pun intended) or another. As it happens, both presidential candidates are connected to sexual scandals, the likes of which we shall explore in Trump’s life.
Mossad’s child-sex ring procurers Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein
Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of late British parliamentarian and media magnate Robert Maxwell, also a Jewish Mossad super sayan[iii] prior to his assassination on November 5, 1991. Ghislaine Maxwell is not only a personal friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton but, apparently, also of Donald Trump (the two have been spotted together on several occasions). Although never charged, it was revealed in U.S. courts that Ghislaine procured young girls for her Jewish billionaire boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein and his friends and associates[iv]. Maxwell was given immunity in the secret plea-bargain, non-prosecution agreement and Epstein’s White House-connected Jewish lawyer Jay Lefkowitz managed to arrange it so that Epstein served only 13 months house arrest for a reduced conviction of soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution, despite that authorities had evidence that he abused up to 40 young girls[v]. Epstein has made 17 out-of-court settlements. The more one looks into it, the more it looks like Maxwell and Epstein were running an international blackmail operation, extending from North America to Eastern Europe. What’s more, testimony from the victims revealed that Ghislaine might have been responsible for setting up the recording of the sexual abuse of the girls, complete with hidden cameras, for blackmail purposes. She is alleged to have even participated in the abuse of young girls herself.[vi]
“Epstein instructed Jane Doe 3 that she was to give the Prince [Andrew] whatever he demanded and required Jane Doe 3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse,” according to court documents lodged by Epstein sex slave Virginia Roberts late in 2014.
Roberts claims it was Epstein who paid her $15,000 for subjecting herself to the 41-year-old Prince. “Jeffrey always took care of paying me after I ‘entertained’ his friends.”
Roberts, now in her 30s, says she first encountered Epstein and Prince Andrew (Duke of York) through Maxwell. She met Maxwell at Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago country club and residence in Florida, where, at only 15 years of age, she worked as a changing room assistant in the club’s spa (her father also worked there as a maintenance manager).
“I was wearing my sexy white Mar-A-Lago uniform—a white miniskirt and skin-tight white polo top—and studying an anatomy book when I was approached by this striking woman in her mid-40s with a very proper British accent—Ghislaine,” Roberts told the Daily Mail.
We can only assume that Trump crafted Mar-A-Lago’s dress code!
Roberts eventually ended up working for Epstein, under the guise of being a masseuse, at Epstein’s Palm Beach waterfront, which is minutes away from Trump’s Mar-A-Lago club and residence. Epstein and Maxwell would groom Roberts and the other underaged sex slaves on techniques of pleasing Epstein and his friends, often involving kinky sexy toys and orgies.
“A lot of powerful men were part of Jeffrey’s scene…,” Roberts says. “Epstein and Maxwell also told me that they wanted me to produce things for them in addition to performing sex on the men. They told me to pay attention to the details about what the men wanted, so I could report back.”
In her affidavit, Roberts goes on to nail down the political, illuministic role of Epstein’s child-sex ring.
“In addition to constantly finding underage girls to satisfy their personal desires, Epstein and Maxwell also got girls for Epstein’s friends and acquaintances. Epstein specifically told me that the reason for him doing this was so that they would ‘owe him,’ they would ‘be in his pocket,’ and he would ‘have something on them.’”
Why Epstein would want dirt on powerful people, other than for his own personal gain, is a mystery. We can only conclude that he was gathering dirt on behalf of some other party, likely the Mossad and/or for Israel’s desk at the CIA. Investigators into the Epstein child-sex scandal turned up a contact book that contained the names and contact information for many prominent people, some of which included New York lawyer Alan Dershowitz, Donald Trump, liquor baron Edgar Bronfman, and former U.S. President William Jefferson Clinton[vii]. Roberts claims she was forced to have sex with Dershowitz six times but denies seeing Clinton having sex with anyone, although he was present at Epstein’s mansion as well as having flown on Epstein’s personal jet. A former employee at the Epstein Palm Beach estate claimed in a sworn deposition that Epstein and Trump had a much closer relationship than what Trump has admitted to. Juan Alessi claimed that Trump had been for dinner at the Epstein estate at least once, while Epstein’s brother Mark stated that he flew with both Jeff and Trump on Epstein’s private plane[viii], what some call “Lolita Express”. (Epstein’s flight manifests)
“They were friends,” Mark Epstein went on to say about Jeff Epstein and Donald Trump’s relationship[ix].
In 2003, The New Yorker reported that Trump attended dinner with Epstein and guests, including Bill Clinton aide Doug band, at his East Side New York townhouse. British cabinet minister Peter Mandelson was also in attendance, which corroborates the legitimacy of the little black book of Epstein’s investigators turned up. Mandelson’s name is in there.
According to a Jan. 29, 2016 article on Vice News,
“Epstein and Maxwell were repeat guests at Mar-A-Lago. In 2000, they hung out there with Prince Andrew, who arrived for vacation on Trump’s private plane. That same year, the Palm Beach Post reported that Trump, Epstein, Prince Andrew, and Maxwell were all at a tennis tournament/celebrity event at Mar-A-Lago.”
Bill Clinton is alleged to have ridden Epstein’s plane from 10 to 20 times.[x]
“He’s a lot of fun to be with,” says Trump of Epstein
At the very least, Donald Trump must have known that one of his miniskirt-clad child workers was ‘working’ for his friend Jeffrey Epstein’s at his mansion a mere 10 minutes away from Trump’s Mar-A-Lago resort. At worst, Trump was helping the Epstein-Maxwell procurement of young, disadvantaged girls for the sexual-blackmail factory the pair were operating and/or Trump was one of Epstein’s child-sex clients himself.
In 2002, while Epstein was using child-sex slaves at his various homes in New York, Palm Beach, and in the Virgin Islands, Trump told New York Magazine that Epstein, his friend of 15 years, was a “terrific guy”.
“He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump continued. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
Did Trump just reveal that he views under-aged girls as women? It appears so, as there is little doubt that Trump encountered Epstein while with one of the dozens of child sex slaves with whom he trophied around the world at social gatherings.
Epstein’s defense deposition stated the following as to whether Trump was involved in the non-stop Epstein orgy.
Q. “Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?” A: “Though I’d like to answer that question, at least today I’m going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.”
This only questioned being in the presence of young girls but Epstein still wouldn’t touch it. Clearly, there is something amiss here.
New rape allegations against Trump corroborate Pussygate, Roberts’ claims
Trump supporters have all too easily dismissed a series of child rape charges against Trump, saying it’s all political and likely orchestrated by the Democratic Party, specifically by Hillary Clinton. But that is unlikely considering Bill Clinton’s own ties to Epstein. Why would Hillary want to open that can of worms? Regardless, when one looks at the court filings, the details of the allegations line up with the claims made in Virginia Roberts’ affidavit. They also corroborate what is already admitted by Trump (his long-term friendship with Epstein) and a recently leaked audiotape[xi] of Trump boasting of his fame-procured sexual license with females and coveting another man’s wife.
“You know I moved on her actually”, Trump told Access Hollywood’s Billy Bush. “You know she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her and I failed. I’ll admit it. I did try and fuck her. She was married.
You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything… Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”
This is exactly the kind of predatory behaviour and arrogance described by a 13-year-old who alleges she was raped by Trump. Disgustingly, Trump supporters were quick to dismiss this show of arrogance as simply locker room banter. Coming from a man of power and wealth like Trump, this was no locker-room banter. This was Trump being honest. And it’s a little hypocritical of Trump supporters to downplay Trump’s disgusting behaviour when they are quick to point out Bill Clinton’s objectification of women and series of rape allegations.
On April 26, a “Katie Johnson” filed a rape complaint in a California Court against defendants Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein[xii]. The complaint was dismissed by a judge due to a lack of plaintiff address, not due to any frivolity of the complaint. Trump supporters were quick to dismiss the charge, however, the lack of address on behalf of the plaintiff could have been due to fear for her life.
“On the fourth and final sexual encounter with the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was tied to a bed by Defendant Trump who then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff Johnson. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff Johnson loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to ‘please wear a condom’. Defendant Trump responded by violently striking Plaintiff Johnson in the face with his open hand and screaming that “he would do whatever he wanted’ as he refused to wear protection. After achieving sexual orgasm, the Defendant, Donald J. Trump put his suit back on and when the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, in tears asked Defendant Trump what would happen if he had impregnated her, Defendant Trump grabbed his wallet and threw some money at her and screamed that she should use the money “to get a fucking abortion’.”
Incidentally, Trump has flip-flopped on his abortion stance. Of course, how could Trump ever ban abortion? What would 13-year-old rape victims do then?
New Jersey lawyer Thomas Francis Meagher revised Johnson’s case and filed it in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
“Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that tool place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan [known as the Wexler Mansion]. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13….”[xiii]
An alleged witness, Tiffany Doe, to the above rape has come forward. She claims she was paid by Epstein to lure underage girls to Epstein-and-friends parties with the bait of promised modeling opportunities.
“It was at these series of parties that I personally witnesses the Paintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.”[xiv]
Tiffany Doe goes on in her affidavit to identify a 12-year-old victim of Trump and Epstein as well as to witness Epstein making death threats to the girls should they reveal the abuse. A second witness to the original Jane Doe (previous pseudonym Katie Johnson) corroborates the story of both Johnson and her lurer.[xv] The case remains open.
Yet another corroborating detail of Trump’s alleged sexual history includes his own wife—at the time, Ivana—accusing him of raping her in 1989. Perhaps convenient for Trump, Ivana somewhat recanted this accusation in July, 2015, just in time for the presidential race[xvi].
Publicly, Trump has made some disturbing, incestuous comments about his own daughters, at one time discussing the potential breast size of his then infant daughter Tiffany[xvii] and also claiming that he would be dating daughter Ivanka had he not been her father[xviii]. Normally when you hear someone talking about legs and breasts, it’s not a parent talking about their infant daughter. Trump thinks this way because that is what must always be on his mind, regardless of age and regardless of kin. Almost every time he publicly talks of Ivanka he can’t help but compliment her body. One cannot rule out the possibility that Ivanka is the victim of sexual abuse and mind control, although there is nothing directly suggesting this (the CIA’s MKUltra program is alleged to have prostituted to children, sometimes with the help of the children’s own parents, to politicians and persons of power). Trump’s posed photo with then 15-year-old Ivanka where she is wearing a short skirt and slinky top without a bra whilst perched atop copulating birds doesn’t help Trump’s avoidance of incest suspicion or MKUltra abuse. Interestingly, Ivanka’s slinky top is covered with butterflies, symbolic of beta kitten programming. Ivanka’s personal contact information was found in Epstein’s black book.
A video recently surfaced showing Donald Trump telling a pre-teen girl that he would be dating her in ten years—just one more piece of evidence that Trump is a sexual predator[xix]. In 2003, Trump went on the Howard Stern show and talked about how hot then 12-year-old Paris Hilton was.
“I’ve known Paris Hilton from the time she’s 12, her parents are friends of mine, and the first time I saw her she walked into the room and I said, ‘Who the hell is that?’ Well, at 12, I wasn’t interested,” Trump said. “I’ve never been into that… but she was beautiful.”
Trump told Stern in that same interview that he had watched Hilton’s sex tape. Big surprise there. What we basically have here is the American version of Jimmy Savile in Donald Trump!
In early 2015, a photo emerged showing Ghislaine Maxwell at the wedding of Chelsea Clinton to Jewish investment banker Marc Mezvinsky in July 2010.
Trump and Mossad arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi
On November 10, 1988, in the midst of the fallout from the Iran-Contra scandal, of which Adnan Khashoggi is believed to have been involved, Donald Trump appeared on the David Letterman show and revealed that he had purchased a “$200-million” yacht (the Nabila) from the Saudi billionaire and arms dealer, who was recruited by Israel’s Mossad for various arms deals and false-flag operations[xx]. Nabila is the daughter of Khashoggi and his then wife Soraya (Sandra Patricia Jarvis-Daly), whom he married when she was 17. Khashoggi is implicated in so many international conspiracies that it would be futile to begin discussing them here. Being tied to so many conspiracies, it’s not surprising to learn that he is tied to the Meyer Lanksy organized crime syndicate, which played a leading role in the murder of President John F. Kennedy. Outrageously, Khashoggi has romanced JFK’s widow Jackie and contributed to Richard Nixon’s 1968 presidential campaign (Trump hatchetman Roger Stone, about whom we shall learn more in Part II, was a Nixon ‘dirty trickster’). Khashoggi is tied to the Warren Commission, which was appointed to coverup the conspiracy to murder JFK, through Joseph A. Ball, who represented Khashoggi in his 1980 divorce from Soraya. Khashoggi’s penchant for women and high rollers is not unlike Donald Trump’s. Khashoggi went on to marry another 17-year-old, Laura Biancolini, who converted to Islam, changed her name to “Lamia” and gave birth to Kahosggi’s fifth son, Ali, in Palm Beach, Florida, home of Trump’s Mar-A-Lago club. Hopsicker says he has information from a Palm Beach source that Trump gave Khashoggi shelter from INTERPOL at Mar-A-Lago when Khashoggi was under indictment for defrauding Thailand’s second largest bank. What’s more, Khashoggi attended Trump’s wedding to Marla Maples at The Plaza Hotel in New York City, December 20, 1993. Maples was Trump’s second wife after the divorce with first wife Ivana in 1992. Interestingly, the Trump-Ivana wedding was ministered by 33rd degree freemason Norman Vincent Peale. The mason Peale also presided over the wedding of Trump’s sister Maryanne. There’s a strong possibility that Trump himself is a freemason. Trump considered Peale his mentor, perhaps a fraternal mentor in the masonic brotherhood?
Interestingly, Khashoggi may be in cahoots with self-appointed conspiracy king Alex Jones, who just happens to be the biggest media cheerleader for Donald Trump at the moment, despite Jones previously suggesting, through Paul Joseph Watson, that Trump was a “ringer for Hillary”. As I documented in my article exposing Jones’ deep Israeli connections, Khashoggi appears to be tied to the 9/11 truth movement through John Gray[xxi]. He is also tied to the Bin Laden family. (See more Khashoggi-9/11 connections in my article “The Growing Complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli connections”.) As we shall see in Part II of this series, the Trump-Khashoggi-Nixon-Jones-Lansky ties will come full circle, with a couple of more characters stepping onto the stage.
The death of Princess Diana was believed by many to be an Mi6-Mossad assassination. Some theories suggest that the establishment didn’t want the Princess of Wales to be carrying the child of a Muslim, one Dodi Fayed, who became romantically involved with her in July, 1997, only a month before her death on August 31. Fayed is the nephew of Adnan Khashoggi. He died alongside the Princess that night in the Pont de A’lma underpass in Paris, a city rife with Mossad activity. It is certain that the marrying of Diana to a Muslim would not have fit the Mossad’s geo-political goals for the UK and the royal family at that time. And Mossad, without a doubt, was at least spying on the couple during their affair, if not masterminding the hit itself.
Khashoggi and “lieutenant” Ramy El-Batwari
Investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker describes Saudi Ramy El-Batrawi as Adnan Khashoggi’s “lieutenant”[xxii]. The two were involved in, among many other schemes, a stock manipulation scandal involving their company Genesis Intermedia, which, incidentally, may be tied to Alex Jones’s Genesis Communications Network, which broadcasts his Infowars show.
“…Ramy El-Batrawi supplied one of SkyWay’s twin DC-9’s,” explains Hopsicker. “Once I’d obtained the FAA registration records for the two DC-9s…it became obvious that both planes had been sheep-dipped through a number of owners of convenience to hide the identity of their true owners, the CIA.”
Hopsicker goes on to detail the Khashoggi-El-Batrawi pyramid of CIA (and Mossad) front companies, with ties to Iran-Contra and 9/11. He also points out that Jewish American businessman, lawyer, and Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald T. Sterling set up a bogus event, supposedly through his Donald T. Sterling Homeless and Medical Center, to honour Ramy El-Batrawi as humanitarian of the year for his support of the homeless in Los Angeles.[xxiii]
“There was no “Donald T. Sterling Homeless and Medical Center”, back then, just for starters,” writes Hopsicker. “Nor is there one today. No institution. No employees. No Board of Directors to mull over who (sic) to choose for next year’s award.”
On June 19, 2014, a tweet was sent out from what is believed to be El-Batwari’s Twitter account with a photo from the bogus event. In the photograph are, among others, Batrawi, supposed 9/11 truther John Gray, and Ivanka Trump! Ivanka must have been there on her father’s behalf. Then, on February 15, 2016, El-Batrwai tweeted another photo, presumably from the same event, of he and Ivanka. Nate Rothschild, slated to become the fifth baron of the infamous Jewish dynasty, has reportedly had flings with both Ivanka Trump and Adnan Khashoggi’s step-daughter Petrina. Ivanka has since married Jewish American businessman Jared Kushner and converted to Judaism herself. In fact, almost all of Donald Trump’s children are married to Jews.
Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part II
By Timothy Fitzpatrick November 8, 2016
Trump’s 9/11 lie about dancing Muslims helps Mossad coverup
Late last year, Donald Trump re-affirmed the official 9/11 story, carefully designed by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak[i] and Israel’s Mossad, perpetuated by the Jewish-dominated American media. He lied about a very important event in the 9/11 story, what has come to be known as the “Dancing Israelis”.
“Hey, I watched when the World Trade Center came tumbling down,” Trump told rally goers in Birmingham, Alabama Nov. 21, 2015. “And I watched in Jersey City, N.J., where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down. Thousands of people were cheering.”[ii]
By the context of his speech, he implied that it was thousands of Muslims cheering in the streets of Jersey. Then, a day later, Trump confirmed in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that he, indeed, was talking about Muslims.
“There were people that were cheering on the other side of New Jersey, where you have large Arab populations. They were cheering as the World Trade Center came down. I know it might be not politically correct for you to talk about it, but there were people cheering as that building came down — as those buildings came down. And that tells you something. It was well covered at the time, George. Now, I know they don’t like to talk about it, but it was well covered at the time. There were people over in New Jersey that were watching it, a heavy Arab population, that were cheering as the buildings came down. Not good.”[iii]
Even the Jewish-controlled New York Times couldn’t accept the preposterous claims by Trump.
“How alarmed were New Jersey officials by reports of Muslims dancing in the streets of Jersey City and Paterson on Sept. 11, 2001, to celebrate the destruction of the World Trade Center?
They feared riots would break out and were ready to send in the National Guard and the State Police to preserve order.
But John J. Farmer Jr., then the New Jersey attorney general and the state’s chief law enforcement officer, said on Tuesday that he ordered an investigation that very day and found the reports to be bogus, more wild stories born in the stricken hours after the attacks.”[iv]
However, the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media joined Trump in covering up the 9/11 conspiracy overall, because they omitted the real dancing celebrants, who were actually a small group of Israelis, likely working as Mossad operatives, possibly having been involved in the conspiracy itself. This despite that the New York Times, embarrassingly, was among the first to break the true story of dancing Israelis celebrating on 9/11. Did they cite their old story from 9/11 in the midst of Trump’s controversial lie about 9/11? No. They would rather pretend that the story didn’t exist.
“The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards.”[v]
On Sept. 20, 2001, nine days after the attack on the World Trade Center, it came out in the American Free Press that these celebrants were Israelis and that New York police arrested them[vi] shortly after witnesses reported their strange behaviour.[vii]
“At least three different groups of Israelis—some of whom may have ties to Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad—were taken into custody after eyewitnesses reported seeing them celebrating in several locations across the river from lower Manhattan in New Jersey. In two cases, the men were reportedly videotaping the initial kamikaze attack on the World Trade Center in New York. All of the detained Israelis are connected to Israeli-owned moving companies operating out of New York and New Jersey.
One group was reported to have been in Liberty State Park in Jersey City, another was seen in Liberty Park in Union City, and a third was apprehended on the roof of an Israeli-owned moving company.”
The New York Jewish Forward newspaper corroborated the AFP story, saying at least two of the arrested celebrants were Israeli and were there to document the event. The five Israelis eventually admitted on Israeli TV that it was they who were at the centre of this controversy and discussed their arrest and interrogation by the FBI, which lasted months.[viii] The Drug Enforcement Administration called their behaviour on 9/11 as suspicious and said it “may well be an organized intelligence-gathering activity.”[ix] (See link to declassified FBI files on dancing Israelis in notes below[x])
“The van belonged to a Mossad front company called Urban Moving Systems. Around 4 p.m. on Sept. 11, the van was pulled over, and five Israelis: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari, all between 22 and 27 years old, were arrested at gunpoint. One had $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock while another carried two foreign passports. Box cutters were found in the van.”[xi]
The AFP interviewed one of the police officers involved in the arrest of the dancing Israelis.[xii]
Trump was given every opportunity by a media that was hanging on his every word to correct his lie to the public. He didn’t, and the media wasn’t buying it, except for Infofwars’ Alex Jones, who despite initially reporting on the dancing Israelis story, too, went wrong along with Trump’s lie. Jones and Infowars have consistently avoided the many Israeli connections to 9/11 since day one. He’s even gone out of his way to say “Israel could not carry out these attacks.”[xiii] And when, during a Trump rally, writer Martin Hill confronted the would-be president on his 9/11 lie, Trump remained silent.[xiv]
Trump and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein—beneficiary of 9/11 attacks
From the very beginning of Donald Trump’s campaign for U.S. president in June 2015, Jewish Zionist Michael Glassner has worked as the campaign’s national political director.[xv] Glassner formerly served on the American Israel Public Affairs Commmittee (AIPAC), one of Israel’s biggest Zionist lobbies in Washington. If that weren’t enough, Glassner was the one responsible for privatizing the World Trade Center lease[xvi], shortly before 9/11, for the benefit of Larry Silverstein’, who profited in the billions from the demolition of the towers. Trump told MSNBC what he thought of Silverstein, his fellow New York real estate tycoon.
“Larry Silverstein—he’s a great guy, he’s a good guy, he’s a friend of mine.”[xvii]
It’s no wonder Trump has been pushing the official, Israeli-created story on 9/11. Glassner is but one of dozens and dozens of Jews working for Trump’s campaign.[xviii] Trump has boasted of his support for Israel on numerous occasions and has even hinted at completing Israel’s Oded Yinon plan, which would include invading Iran as well as making Jerusalem Israel’s undivided capital…in other words, finally disposing of those pesky Palestinians.[xix] Trump crony Rudolph Giuliani, whom is believed to have contributed to the 9/11 conspiracy coverup by promptly destroying and removing the crime scene at the World Trade Centre, is a candidate for Trump’s cabinet as president.
Roy Cohn—Trump’s gay, Jewish handler, mob lawyer, and JFK conspirator?
If the close friendship of a self-purported anti-establishment Republican like Donald Trump with a gay, Jewish, AIDS-infested, mobster lawyer named Roy Marcus Cohn seems odd, it’s because it is. The late Cohn was not only part of the false-opposition McCarthyite anti-Communist movement of the 1950s, at times working both sides of the political spectrum, but also a Meyer Lansky organized crime syndicate operative who went so far as to serve on the infamous Permindex board[xx], which is believed to have been Mossad’s key operating front in the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy. Also, Cohn’s Lionel Corporation held shares in Permindex. Cohn became close friends with Trump and also his legal counsel, starting in the 1970s.[xxi] As with almost all of Trump’s suspicious associates, Cohn was sexually compromised and apparently enjoyed sexually compromising others.[xxii] Like Jeffrey Epstein and his child procurer Ghislaine Maxwell, Cohn is believed to have used child prostitutes to blackmail politicians, himself not only a homosexual but also believed to have been involved in the Franklin scandal—a child-sex ring that reached the Reagan White House.[xxiii] Cohn aided Roger Stone in Ronald Reagan’s 1970-80 presidential campaign. A June 28, 1989 Washington Times exposé implicated Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence in a call-boys and crack scandal that appears to be one small piece of the Franklin scandal.[xxiv]The inner workings of the scandal shares striking similarities with Virginia Roberts’ description of Epstein’s blackmail techniques. Cohn is mentioned in the report as an associate of Spence as well as lawyer and activist Phyllis Schlafly, who was also a regular guest on the Alex Jones show prior to her death earlier this year. Some say that Schlafly and pseudo conservatives like Jones are part of a right-wing conspiracy centered on the Council for National Policy (CNP).
Roger Stone – Trump cheerleader, Cohn associate, and Infowarrior
Lending credence to theory of Cohn as a child-sex blackmailer is self-described “libertine” Roger Stone[xxv], a Cohn associate, former advisor to Donald Trump, and regular guest on Alex Jones’ Infowars broadcast of late.
“Roy was not gay. He was a man who liked having sex with men. Gays were weak, effeminate. He always seemed to have these young blond boys around. It just wasn’t discussed. He was interested in power and access.”[xxvi]
Power and access…sounds like the life ambitions of Donald Trump, doesn’t it? Now we can see why Trump found such a mentor in Cohn.
It seems that Stone, a man who has been spotted marching in gay pride parades[xxvii], was close enough to the homosexual and possible pederast Cohn that he helped cover up Mossad’s (and possibly Cohn’s) leading role and coverup of the JFK assassination when he published a book blaming LBJ for the entire thing.[xxviii] Stone’s book also implicates Richard Nixon, a man for whom Stone has campaigned and supported for years (Stone even has a life-sized tattoo of Nixon on his backside). Why Stone would implicate one of his heroes is odd, unless he was carrying out a coverup/limited hangout operation on behalf of someone else, perhaps the Mossad. Of course, Stone waited until Nixon was dead before he would dare make such an accusation. Investigative journalist and author Michael Collins Piper, who is the world’s premier theorist that Israel and Mossad assassinated JFK with help from the Lansky crime syndicate, the CIA, the mob, and others (thoroughly documented in his book, Final Judgement[xxix]), believed that Nixon was not involved in any way in the JFK assassination. Incidentally, Stone’s partner in disinformation Alex Jones has publicly denied Israel’s involvement in the JFK assassination conspiracy.[xxx]
Trump continues the work of Mossad’s Permindex by covering up truth about JFK assassination
Trump, himself, has also aided in the coverup of the JFK assassination by ridiculously claiming that GOP nominee opponent Ted Cruz’s father was with JFK’s alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before the president’s murder took place. Whether or not Rafael Cruz was with Oswald handing out pro-Fidel Castro pamphlets in New Orleans in 1963, as Trump, Stone, and a National Enquirer story claim, is irrelevant, because Oswald obviously was not the assassin but was exactly what he said he was—a patsy. Trump, whose mentor Roy Cohn sat on the board of Permindex and is tied to CIA men like the Dulles brothers, one of whom sat on the sham commission set up to pretend to investigate the JFK assassination conspiracy, is endorsing the long-debunked official story put out by that very same Warren Commission. The Warren Commission was set up by Israel’s Mossad and its allies in the CIA to hide their central role in the murder of Kennedy. Even today, Trump aids and abets the Jewish terrorist organization Mossad. He is beholden to them and must not step out of line.
The kinky Stone-Infowars-Drudge echo chamber Roger Stone has been an almost-daily guest on the Infowars show over the last several months, always, to promote Trump. The endless echo chamber the two have created has been expanded by the likes of other Jewish-controlled alternative media operations like Breitbart and the Drudge Report, which is run by yet another gay Jew, Matt Drudge.
Alex Jones could also be sexually compromised. In the leaked divorce with his then Jewish wife Kelly (Violet)[xxxi], which I reported on last year, court documents revealed that Jones was counseled by a team of marriage counselors, with a large number of them specializing in sexual addictions. Jones’ ties to Hollywood slime like Charlie Sheen doesn’t help his public image as an innocent all-American boy. Jones is a divorcee who is known to flirt with women on air, including his own hosts and guests, and apparently hooks his trashy friends up with hookers, like in the case of Amanda Bruce.[xxxii] Again, Trump’s ring of supporters reek of sexual compromise—an apparent top-down effect. Unfortunately for Jones, he does not have the excuse of shilling for Israel due to blackmail, at least that we know of. He has been the Zionists’ biggest alternative media cheerleader since 1996, long before Jones was divorced and potentially blackmailed. There have been rumours of homosexual affairs involving Jones but nothing that can be substantiated. Trump appears to take his anti-establishment talking-point cues from Alex Jones, as Trump often will publicly say things verbatim that were stated by Alex Jones on his radio show. There is no question that Jones has acted as Trump’s unofficial public relations manager. For months, Jones has campaigned for Trump almost daily on his three-hour radio broadcasts.
The Lansky organized crime syndicate
Trump’s ties to the Lansky organized crime syndicate, run by Jewish Zionist mob boss of bosses Meyer Lansky, do not end at Roy Cohn and his membership on the board of Permindex or at Adnan Khashoggi. In 1987, Trump took over Lansky’s Mossad/CIA money-laundering front, the Mary Carter Paint Company, then renamed Resorts International, from CIA frontman James Crosby. Michael Collins Piper writes,
“In 1958-59 Dewey and a number of associates used a reported $2 million in CIA funds to buy a controlling interest in the Crosby-Miller Corporation (headed by Dewey friend James Crosby), which was then merged with Mary Carter.”[xxxiii]
Note that Dewey is tied to the coverup of the JFK assassination conspiracy through the Lansky syndicate.
Piper continues,
“In 1963, Mary Carter Paint spun off its paint division and during the next several years began developing its casino operations, particularly in the Bahamas. In 1967-68, Mary Carter Paint officially changed its name to Resorts International and began massive international expansion. The Spotlight determined that several principal investors provided the funds and assets for the venture.”
Piper lists those principal investors as:
Meyer Lansky, the acknowledged “chairman of the board” and chief financier of the underworld gambling syndicate, who maintained his own longstanding ties to not only Israel and the Mossad, but also the CIA and the American intelligence community;
David Rockefeller, head of the Rockefeller financial empire, who provided his family’s clout and CIA and global banking connections to assist in the operation;
The Investors Overseas Service (IOS), then the world’s largest flight-capital conglomerate, controlling assets worth $2.5 billion.
Tibor Rosenbaum, who was not only the Mossad’s Swiss-based chief financier behind covert arms deals but also the head of the Banque De Credit Internationale of Geneva, the Lansky syndicate’s chief European money laundry; and
Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the European banking family and a personal business partner of Rosenbaum in Rosenbaum’s Mossad-related ventures ranging far and wide; and lastly,
William Mellon Hitchcock, one of the heirs to the Mellon family fortune (one of America’s largest private family fortunes, which, for many years, has also maintained close ties with the CIA).
Trump eventually dumped his Resorts International investments during his bankruptcy, and the company ceased operations in 2014. It’s difficult to believe that the money laundering and skimming of casino profits suddenly stopped when Trump took over the intelligence front. What Lansky’s career in crime showed was that casinos were good for stealing from the poor, getting rich, and laundering money for groups interested in carrying out covert and illegal operations.
One of Lansky’s partners, the late Jewish Louis Lesser, in 1990 sold Donald Trump The Taj Mahal Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City.[xxxiv] Trump refers to the syndicate operative Lesser as a “legend”.[xxxv] After the Mahal went bankrupt, court proceedings revealed Trump’s casino was involved in money laundering.[xxxvi]
Newt Gingrich’s Trump lie
Before I go on here, I should point out that it was largely the March 2016 televised propaganda of Zionist neocon Newt Gingrich that led to the public’s false perception of Donald Trump as an anti-establishment outsider. On Fox News, Gingrich attempted to paint Trump as not belonging to the Judeo-masonic cryptocracy[xxxvii], which he undoubtedly is a member, likely as a freemason. Gingrich’s lies were televised as part of a script to set up Hillary’s strawman, false opposition, which he has now shown to be. The Gingrich lie paved the way for the conservative-thinking public to be groomed for Trump to be their hero.
Jewish casino magnate Carl Icahn
Aging casino magnate and hedge fund investor Carl Icahn is yet another apparent Lanksy organized crime syndicate operative and friend to Donald Trump. Icahn is tied to the kosher 9/11 truth movement through John Gray[xxxviii] and is connected to Trump associate and Mossad asset Adnan Khashoggi, the Saudi billionaire. Icahn extended a $100-million line of credit to Khashoggi in his failed GenesisIntermedia endeavour[xxxix], likely an intelligence front and money laundering operation like many of his others. Trump has teased a bid to make Icahn treasury secretary should he become U.S. president.[xl] Interestingly, Khashoggi and Trump associate Ramy El-Batrawi, from Part I of this series, two years ago tweeted Icahn the following message: “@Carl_C_Icahn “hi Carl how are you its been a long time.”
Shortly before its closure on Oct. 10, 2016, Icahn tried to bail out Trump’s bankrupt, money-laundering Taj Mahal (Mahal property was originally part of Lansky’s Resorts International front). Although he wasn’t able to save the resort, Icahn Enterprises gained control over Trump’s other banrkupt casino, the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino, run by Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. Icahn took it over this year, two years after its filing for bankruptcy.
Conclusion
What I have attempted to show here is that U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump is a sexually compromised and, subsequently, blackmailed stooge for the Jewish-masonic cryptocracy, specifically controlled by Israel’s Mossad. His public image in the race for president is fake and is designed to radicalize the right while pushing the left further into the arms of awaiting candidate Hillary Clinton. A recent Wikileaks of the Podesta files reveals that the Clinton team wanted extreme Republicans as the best possible opponents leading up to her election win.[xli] Trump has certainly achieved this, by saying all the things the opposition wanted to hear. Today, Trump continues to carry out the Judeo-Masonic agenda while providing catharsis to the alternative right, who take him at face value.
Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III
By Timothy Fitzpatrick November 19, 2016 Anno Domini
Trump mentor Roy Cohn a pedophile protector who blackmailed his protégé at Plaza Hotel ‘blue suite’?
The bullish New York attorney Roy Cohn was the quintessential false-opposition operative working under Senator Joseph McCarthy. He prosecuted and persecuted communists, as part of the establishment-controlled red scare, as well as homosexuals, despite being a homosexual himself. But how he was so successful, achieving a huge amount of federal indictments as McCarthy’s aide and attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, was likely due to a dirty, dark secret of his: sexual blackmail, especially of the pedophile kind. Biographer Burton Hersh reveals about Cohn,
“…When New York attorney John Klotz began to investigate Roy Cohn on behalf of a client…declassified New York government files and spadework by a private detective substantiated the allegation that there was indeed a ‘blue suite’ at the Plaza, Suite 233. ‘Roy Cohn was providing protection,’ Klotz discovered. ‘There were a bunch of pedophiles involved. That’s where Cohn got his power from—blackmail.’”[i]
Not only was Cohn tied to the Nebraska GOP pederast ring (Franklin scandal), as we discovered in Part II of this series, Cohn was involved in a New York City sex ring, run out of a Manhattan hotel that eventually became owned by Cohn’s protégé Donald J. Trump in 1988. Had Trump himself been compromised by Cohn in suite 233 with some child prostitute, not unlike the way Trump’s friend Jeffrey Epstein would compromise elites at his “Lolita Island”? Katie Johnson, who was only 13 years old at the time, claims to have been lured to one of Epstein’s underage sex parties in New York, where she was violently raped by Trump?[ii]
“(Detective James) Rothstein had an opportunity to have a sit-down with infamous McCarthy committee counsel Roy Cohn. During this sit-down, Cohn admitted to Rothstein that he was part of a rather elaborate sexual blackmail operation that compromised politicians with child prostitutes (Rothstein, no pagination). Cohn told Rothstein that this operation was being carried out as part of the anticommunist crusade of the time (no pagination).[iii]
There doesn’t seem to be any proof that Cohn had compromised Trump, although we do know that Trump followed in the footsteps of Cohn, even assuming his bullish demeanor, as well as the two exchanging favors for years up until Trump abandoned his friend after it was revealed publicly that he had AIDS.
“I hear Roy in the things he says quite clearly,” said Peter Fraser, who as Mr. Cohn’s lover for the last two years of his life spent a great deal of time with Mr. Trump. “That bravado, and if you say it aggressively and loudly enough, it’s the truth — that’s the way Roy used to operate to a degree, and Donald was certainly his apprentice.”[iv]
Convict Jeffrey Epstein continued this illuministic spirit pioneered by Cohn in the New York underworld in the ring he appeared to have run, in connection with Trump’s Mar-A-Lago resort, which was apparently a proving ground for would-be sex slaves. And the whole notion of anti-communism as saving America was the convenient bait used in a basic Hegelian dialectical system. Cohn was vice president of rabbi George Sokolsky’s political action committee, the American Jewish League Against Communism (this league officially endorsed the Jewish-controlled John Birch Society, which has tentacles all over the alt right). Not only did Cohn’s sex ring help him advance his legal career, it helped him advance Jewish interests, specifically its capitalist dialectic in the West.
Pedophile book on Cohn’s sex ring stashed at Watergate?
Could the Watergate burglars have been after a pedophile book that contained the names of Cohn’s sexually compromised Republican Party and New York elites, which may have included Donald Trump’s name?
“[Detective] Rothstein also had an opportunity to speak to infamous Watergate burglar Frank Sturgis. During this conversation, Sturgis revealed one of the reasons for breaking into the Watergate. According to Sturgis, there was a “Pedophile Book” hidden away at the Democratic National Committee headquarters (no pagination). The book was supposed to have a list of pedophiles on the American political scene (no pagination).”[v]
This alleged book, no doubt, would have had dirt on Democrats, too.
“Fugitive ex-CIA officer Frank Terpil has claimed that sexual blackmailing operations directed by the CIA were intensive in Washington during the Watergate era (DeCamp 179). Terpil also asserts that his former partner, Ed Wilson, was coordinating one of these sexual blackmail operations (179). In a letter to author Jim Hougan, Terpil revealed Wilson’s modus operandi:
‘“Historically, one of Wilson’s Agency jobs was to subvert members of both houses [of Congress] by any means necessary…. Certain people could be easily coerced by living out their sexual fantasies in the flesh…. A remembrance of these occasions [was] permanently recorded via selected cameras…. The technicians in charge of filming… were TSD [Technical Services Division of the CIA]. The unwitting porno stars advanced in their political careers, some of [whom] may still be in office.” (Qtd. in DeCamp 179)’”
According to John DeCamp, Wilson’s ring was a continuation of Cohn’s.[vi]
Late journalist and author Michael Collins Piper makes a good case for the Watergate scandal actually being orchestrated by Israel’s Mossad to take down Nixon—in a continuation of a takedown of those in the JFK administration still working in government.[vii] Interestingly, James Jesus Angleton, Mossad’s top ally in the CIA and alleged architect of the deliberately botched Watergate burglary apparently had sexually compromising photos of Cohn associate 33rd degree freemason J. Edgar Hoover.
“Author Anthony Summers, in his recently-released biography of former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, described how the alleged compromising photos of Hoover engaged in homosexual activities (described in Chapter 7) managed to surface in relation to the Garrison investigation.”
According to Summers, he was told by former CIA contract operative Gordon Novel that he (Novel) was shown such photos by James J. Angleton.”[viii]
Piper illustrates how it was Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky who spearheaded the blackmail of homosexual Hoover.
“Summers created a media sensation when he alleged in his new biography of Hoover, Official and Confidential, and on the PBS series “Frontline,” that Lansky blackmailed Hoover with supposed photos of Hoover engaged in homosexual activity.”[ix]
Could Lansky and his associates have directed Cohn’s sex ring? Hoover is alleged to have been witnessed dressed up drag with two young boys at the Plaza Hotel. Could it have been at Cohn’s Room 233 pedophile hangout?
Daily Mail lies about Trump rape accuser following convenient dropping of her lawsuit
A week before the U.S. federal election, Katie Johnson, the woman who filed a lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump raped her when she was 13 at an Epstein sex party in New York, cancelled a press conference, at which she was to reveal her identity (the conference would precede the approaching pre-trial in December of this year). On November 2, Johnson’s legal representative, Los Angeles civil rights attorney Lisa Bloom, told a press scrum at her Woodland Hills, Los Angeles offices that Johnson would not be appearing due to fear of her life following threats.
“I have bad news. Jane Doe has received numerous threats today as have all the Trump accusers that I have represented.”[x]
Then, only three days before the election, Johnson withdrew her lawsuit against the would-be President of the United States and his longtime friend Jewish billionaire and convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who raped Johnson and other young girls while having them play out role-playing fantasies, exactly as the aforementioned Terpil explains about the CIA’s blackmail techniques.
That the dropping of the suit was a huge convenience for Trump and his eventual election goes without saying. Johnson’s deposition stated that Trump and Epstein threatened her life and those of the other child victims if they were to reveal the crime. It appears that, with this decades’ old threat, they finally got to Johnson and her lawyer in time for the election.
The mainstream media was mysteriously silent on the Johnson lawsuit, with the Daily Mail being the main conduit to disseminate information to the public regarding the case. The Daily Mail’s last article on the Johnson-Trump rape scandal was published on Nov. 7, 2016, the eve of the election, with the deceptive headline of “EXCLUSIVE: Troubled woman with a history of drug use who claimed that she was assaulted by Donald Trump at a Jeffrey Epstein sex party at age 13 MADE IT ALL UP”.[xi] Notice that the writer of the article headline used all upper case letters for the lie they told. This despite that the article never conclusively proves that she made up her story. No where does Johnson say she made anything up, yet the Daily Mail crafted this politically-motivated, click-baiting headline to suggest otherwise. The Mail also slanted the story to suggest that Johnson’s claims were that of a drug-riddled, troubled person. If this is true, it is not an uncommon result for rape victims. In truth, the Daily Mail was counting on people reading only the dismissive headline rather than reading the article and weighing the evidence and deciding for themselves. Reading on in that article, there is very scant evidence from a conveniently anonymous source that Johnson made up her story. Furthermore, the Daily Mail itself spoke with Epstein procurer “Tiffany” who corroborated Johnson’s entire story, which just happens to corroborate Virginia Roberts proven claims against Epstein. It seems the Daily Mail was given a last-minute directive (by Mossad?) to exonerate Trump, thus the Mail’s sudden and unsubstantiated dismissal of Johnson’s claims. Ironically, child-sex procurer Ghislaine Maxwell’s Mossad-asset father Robert Maxwell controlled much of Britain’s media at one time. It’s likely that Britain’s media, today, is still in similar hands, thus the dramatic U-turn by the Daily Mail in the Johnson case.
Adding to the disinformation surrounding this case is the double standard held by Trump supporters and the pseudo alternative media. Rape allegations—all of them—against Bill and Hillary Clinton are fair game but any against Trump are off limits.
Pizzagate: Interference play or further down the rabbit hole
Shortly before the U.S. federal election, image-board discussion group 4 Chan, Reddit, and the highly suspicious “anonymous” is alleged to have broken an elite Washington DC child-sex scandal dubbed “Pizzagate”.[xii] Of course, it only involves democrats, even though the GOP has a history with child sex rings, like the aforementioned Franklin scandal in Nebraska and Washington DC. It’s too early to determine right now the veracity of this conspiracy theory; however, those in conspiracy circles have completely bought into the theory blindly without investigating too deeply. There are inconsistencies in the story.[xiii] The fact that the story was automatically believed shows the mindset of Trump supporters and those on the alt right. They are as controlled as their opponents on the left, who also believe anything spoon-fed to them by Leftist talking heads.
The timing of the release of this scandal, thanks to Wikileaks hacked/leaked emails, is also suspect, as the rape case against Trump was gaining momentum as well as articles like mine showing Trump (and Clinton’s) connections child-sex ring of Jeffrey Epstein and his Mossad asset Ghislaine Maxwell. The right wing has had no interest in Wikileaks up until Trump announced his running for president, at which point Wikileaks seemed to suddenly shift its focus against the Democrats. Time and thorough investigation will reveal wether Pizzagate is legitimate or merely a distraction. There is also the possibility that Pizzagate is true but is limited hangout. Or, perhaps, Pizzagate is connected to Epstein and his Mossad-run child-sex ring.
[i] Hersh, Burton, Bobby and J. Edgar: The Historic Face-off Between The Kennedys and J. Edgar Hoover That Transformed America, Carroll & Graf Publishers, New York, 2007, pg. 88
[vii] Piper, Michael Collins, Final Judgment: the Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, America First Books, Sixth Edition, American Free Press, 2005, pg. 364-382 – http://americanfreepress.net/PDF/Final_Judgment.pdf
"That's all these “Islamic leaders” can do while many of them still keep doing business with the Jews?
What a bunch of fucking cowards!
"SORT OF LIKE YOU! COWARDLY REMAINING UNDER "THE JEW" BY YOUR REFUSAL TO DEAL WITH COMMERCE FOR WHAT IT IS? Refusing to live the alternative as you parrot it!?
Have these cowards seen enough of what the terrorist Jews have been genociding in Gaza and Lebanon? Have these cowards seen enough of what the so-called United Nation and the so-caled international community have done to stop the gon-going genocide?
SO ONLY GAZA AND LEBANON ARE VISIBLE TO YOU? WW1, WW2 AND ALL THAT CAME AFTER ARE NOT WORTHY? YOU GAVE EXACTLY 0 SHITS THEN AS YOUR CHOSEN LIFESTYLE SHOWS YOU STILL DON'T! Waiting for "good news " is exactly what the kind of moron you describe and claim others are as YOU'RE DOING THE SAME!
Have these cowards seen Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis are fighting back to stop the genocide?
ARE YOU "FIGHTING BACK" AGAINST HOW "THE JEW" USES YOUR ENERGY? Are YOU working to keep your energy from "the jew"? No? why not?
Don’t these stupid cowards understand that the Jews will kill them all the same in the end?"
DO YOU UNDERSTAND AS LONG AS YOU'RE USING COMMERCE TO FILL YOUR NEEDS YOU'RE ONE OF THE STUPID COWARDS FEEDING "THE JEW" AS YOU WAIT FOR "GOOD NEWS " NOT BROUGHT INTO REALITY BY YOU!? As most are, you're one of the cattle WAITING FOR OTHERS TO DO WHAT WE MUST DO!
"That's all these “Islamic leaders” can do while many of them still keep doing business with the Jews?
What a bunch of fucking cowards!
"SORT OF LIKE YOU! COWARDLY REMAINING UNDER "THE JEW" BY YOUR REFUSAL TO DEAL WITH COMMERCE FOR WHAT IT IS? Refusing to live the alternative as you parrot it!?
Have these cowards seen enough of what the terrorist Jews have been genociding in Gaza and Lebanon? Have these cowards seen enough of what the so-called United Nation and the so-caled international community have done to stop the gon-going genocide?
SO ONLY GAZA AND LEBANON ARE VISIBLE TO YOU? WW1, WW2 AND ALL THAT CAME AFTER ARE NOT WORTHY? YOU GAVE EXACTLY 0 SHITS THEN AS YOUR CHOSEN LIFESTYLE SHOWS YOU STILL DON'T! Waiting for "good news " is exactly what the kind of moron you describe and claim others are as YOU'RE DOING THE SAME!
Have these cowards seen Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis are fighting back to stop the genocide?
ARE YOU "FIGHTING BACK" AGAINST HOW "THE JEW" USES YOUR ENERGY? Are YOU working to keep your energy from "the jew"? No? why not?
Don’t these stupid cowards understand that the Jews will kill them all the same in the end?"
DO YOU UNDERSTAND AS LONG AS YOU'RE USING COMMERCE TO FILL YOUR NEEDS YOU'RE ONE OF THE STUPID COWARDS FEEDING "THE JEW" AS YOU WAIT FOR "GOOD NEWS " NOT BROUGHT INTO REALITY BY YOU!? As most are, you're one of the cattle WAITING FOR OTHERS TO DO WHAT WE MUST DO!