Judaism Is Jewish Chosenism, An Anti-Humanity Cult of Hate and Death

The Absurdities, Cruelty, and Anti-humanity of Jewish Chosenism (a.k.a Judaism) and its problematic by-product "Zionism" and its nonsensical weapon "Antisemitism"

To cut to the chase, Zionism is the manifestation of the religious-political ideology of Judaism in modern time. And original Judaism is a cult of death, hate, deception, and destruction. A negation of humanity, so to speak.

This confirmation or rather the confession I should say, is a straight quote from the horse mouth:

“Apparently, Jewishness is about neither religion nor race. Unlike a race, you can get in, but unlike religion, once you’re in you can’t get out. As with Achan, once you are a part of this people, you are the entire people. As Israel is eternal, so your bond with them is irreversible, unbreakable and eternal.”

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1269075/jewish/Is-a-Jew-Who-Converts-Still-Jewish.htm

As a matter of fact, one does not need such “honest confession” to know such designed confusing absurdity. One just needs a little bit of time and attention to observe the “Jews” around the world and read one or two of their so-called “Jewish laws” to grasp such confusing absurdity and “evil oddities” of Judaism! Even to jewfiliate people themselves! Go figure!

The Chosen “Race”

Now first, just look around you and around the world, you would see “Jews” and “Jewesses” in different “races”, different “ethnicities”, different “cultures”… or just say different colors! White, pink, black, brown, yellow, good, bad, stupid, retarded, smart… etc…

This Indonesian guy below claims, believes, and decides he is Jewish because along the line of his ancestors there was a Dutch Jewess, who married a native male Indonesian presumably a Muslim!

According to “Judaist laws” and “theology,” anyone was born to a Jewess is automatically a Jew forever. Nothing, no one can change such fate and “destiny” even the person him/herself wishes to be otherwise, or even Yahweh cannot do anything about such “covenant !” Such an absurd cruelty, but clever arrangement indeed!

Side notes: What would happen to the whole Royal family and the whole country when a King married a Jewess? As in the case of the fictional story of Esther? Just to provoke your “critical thinking” folks! IMHO, I suspect that the “Judaist matrilineality” was designed/established for this particular purpose! Think about this and the “Jewish problem” we have been facing folks!

Thus, obviously Jew is not a "RACE." Not even an ethnicity or a culture.

And, since “Jewishness” is “chosen” and “ordained” by birth to be above the rest of humanity a.k.a Gentiles/Goyim by a cruel, jealous, vindictive, small minded evil Yahweh with an absurd “covenant” under duress with existential threat! Jew is absolutely not a Religion in a positive sense of a theology (mythical belief) with a set of strict dogma and doctrine that a beloved and benevolent Deity command his/her believers/followers to do good for their fellow human beings and for Humanity as a whole at their own volition.

Theologically, to be Jewish is to hate all the rest of Humanity. Or rather to be an eternal enemy of the rest of Humanity. According to their “Judaist laws” of “Dispensationalism” Jews do not have to be good to anyone, but to “good” Jews only! As a matter of fact per “Judaist/Talmudic Dispensationalism,” Jews are allowed, even encouraged to commit any criminal act to other non-Jew and “bad” Jews when such act serves the Jews! Please read:

Well-informed and well versed Jews know and understand their own evilness in their nefarious belief system and have from time to time “modifed” their “holy verses” to hide their nefariousness and evilness in order to gaslighting gullible people!

Gaslighting and Deception in Details

I bet everyone of you folks would at least hear of the movie “Schindler's List.” Everyone would remember this fiction was (mis)presented as documentary in B/W motion as “true story” by Hollywood Jewish director Steven Spielberg.

The movie based on a fiction, the novel was written by an Australian writer, Thomas Keneally (1982). The movie itself generated quite a controversy and strong criticism of the movie at the time within the “Jewish world!” Jews criticized the movie that it was not “Jewish enough!” Because the center/hero of the movie is NOT a Jew or Jewishness but a Christ like (Catholic christian) German who saves the Jews! But it’s not the point here. (I will put all the related information on this “controversial movie” at the appendix.)

The point is: At near the end of the movie, where Schindler is presented with a ring on which a Talmud quote was engraved to thank and praise him:

“whoever saves one life, save the world entire”

The fact is the word “JEWISH” in the real Talmud was nefariously omitted.

The Talmud “teaches” that “whoever saves a single Jewish life is considered as if he saved an entire world”

The Original Text

The original text in the Talmud reads: “לפיכך נברא אדם יחידי ללמדך שכל המאבד נפש אחת מישראל מעלה עליו הכתוב כאילו איבד עולם מלא; וכל המקיים נפש אחת מישראל מעלה עליו הכתוב כאילו קיים עולם מלא” (Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5).

The Stipulation of “Jewish Life”

The original text explicitly states “מישראל” (miYisrael), which means “from Israel” or “a Jew.” This stipulation is often omitted in English translations, leading to confusion about whether the precept applies to all human life or only Jewish life.

לפיכך נברא אדם יחידי ללמדך. שכל המאבד נפש אחת מישראל. מעלה עליו הכתוב כאילו איבד עולם מלא. וכל המקיים נפש אחת מישראל מעלה עליו הכתוב כאילו קיים עולם מלא. ומפני שלום הבריות. שלא יאמר אדם לחבירו אבא גדול מאביך. ושלא יהו מינין אומרים הרבה רשויות בשמים. ולהגיד גדולתו של הקדוש ברוך הוא. שאדם טובע כמה מטבעות בחותם אחד וכולן דומין זה לזה. ומלך מלכי המלכים הקדוש ברוך הוא טבע כל אדם בחותמו של אדם הראשון ואין אחד מהן דומה לחבירו. לפיכך כל אחד ואחד חייב לומר בשבילי נברא העולם.

https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/74049/anyone-who-saves-a-life-is-as-if-he-saved-an-entire-world-jewish-life-or-any

This particular Talmud “teaching” is “controversial” even to jewfiliate people! For its apparently dishonesty and deliberately trying to hide “something maybe nefarious ” associated with “Jewishness.”

Zionism is an integral part of Judaism

We should come back to discuss a little bit deeper about the “Judaist matrilineality.” This particular “Judaist matrilineality” law derives from a horrific and cruel story in Judaist racism and their monstrous evil Yahweh:

-Deuteronomy 7:4,

The generation that is about to enter the Land of Canaan is told:

You shall not intermarry with them; you shall not give your daughter to his son, and you shall not take his daughter for your son. For he will turn away your son from following Me, and they will worship the gods of others, and the wrath of G‑d will be kindled against you, and He will quickly destroy you.

Now you can see Zionism is not a product of modern nationalism by Theodor Herzl and his chosen rat cabal in the late 19th century . And the current genocidal action in Gaza is not just the “trauma” from 7-Octorber-2023 Palestinian uprising! Let’s re-read these verses carefully:

So, given such cruel and cunning “covenant with Yahweh,” the next logical question would arise: What about the children of non-Jewish mother and a Jewish father? As you have seen per Torah/Zera 10 edicts they are NOT Jewish, they are sub-human although they are directly from the “seed/blood” of their Jewish fathers. These children are rejected and disposed accordingly with their non-Jewish mothers! (You see Hannibal directive is NOT new at all)

One should also notice that while Jewishness is “created” in “matrilineality,” ruling power/priesthood is “patrilineal.” What a cunning arrangement it is! That’s why they only claim “the LORD GOD of your FATHERS” Not of mothers!

Zionism, after all, is a “earthy” manifestation of the “covenant” in Judaism in order to flow with the modern statist environment, so to speak. And Zionist MO is rooted and derived firmly and faithfully from the Torah edicts and Talmud’s “values”.

The Weaponized Nonsensical “Antisemitism!”

Semite is neither race nor a religion! Semite is a group of peoples who speak Semitic languages! A Semite is a person who speaks a Semitic language. “Semite” derives from a fictitious character Shem, the son of Noah, who was born when Noah was 500 years old! Such a reification of bullshit!

So, antisemitism is anti-entire-group of different people in a large geographical part of the world! But why such large multi-ethnicity term only used to refer exclusively to “Jews?” Why anti-Jew, a proper and accurate term is not used instead?

Why everyone including scholars and even knowledgeable Rabbi such as Yaakov Shipiro and Gilad Atzmon frequently use this nonsensical term to refer exclusively to Jews?

Obviously, antisemitism by itself is nonsensical and stupid term. One can see how absurd of the plot to assign this “semitism” exclusively to “Jews” and its “Jewishness”, which is a modern invention of absurdity with the purpose of establishing a confusing labyrinth NOT ONLY for the “Goyim” but also for naive “ jewfiliate people” themselves!

The whole purpose is to create a confusion of absurdity. Semantic obfuscation and reification fallacy. So far this strategy has been very effective… sort of!

You have to do kind of exegesis!

This strategy of deception and confusion has its historical origin at the heart of Judaism itself, the Torah and the Talmud. In the short book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion : The Weight of Three Thousand Years (1994)(100 pages) the late Israeli professor Israel Shahak exposed the crux of such evil roots. Here a long quote from the book is needed to prove the point:

“Needless to say, all this was a calculated lie from beginning to end; and following the establishment of the State of Israel, once the rabbis felt secure, all the offensive passages and expressions were restored without hesitation in all new editions. (Because of the enormous cost which a new edition involves, a considerable part of the Talmudic literature, including the Talmud itself, is still being reprinted from the old editions. For this reason, the above mentioned Talmudic Omissions have now been published in Israel in a cheap printed edition, under the title Hesronot Shas.) So now one can read quite freely - and Jewish children are actually taught - passages such as that (18) which commands every Jew, whenever passing near a cemetery, to utter a blessing if the cemetery is Jewish, but to curse the [24] mothers of the dead (19) if it is non-Jewish. In the old editions the curse was omitted, or one of the euphemisms was substituted for 'Gentiles'. But in the new Israeli edition of Rabbi Adin Steinsalz (complete with Hebrew explanations and glosses to the Aramaic parts of the text, so that schoolchildren should be in no doubt as to what they are supposed to say) the unambiguous words 'Gentiles' and 'strangers' have been restored.

Under external pressure, the rabbis deceptively eliminated or modified certain passages - but not the actual practices which are prescribed in them. It is a fact which must be remembered, not least by Jews themselves, that for centuries our totalitarian society has employed barbaric and inhumane customs to poison the minds of its members, and it is still doing so. (These inhumane customs cannot be explained away as mere reaction to antisemitism or persecution of Jews: they are gratuitous barbarities directed against each and every human being. A pious Jew arriving for the first time in Australia, say, and chancing to pass near an Aboriginal graveyard, must - as an act of worship of 'God' - curse the mothers of the dead buried there.) Without facing this real social fact, we all become parties to the deception and accomplices to the process of poisoning the present and future generations, with all the consequences of this process.

The Deception Continues Modern scholars of Judaism have not only continued the deception, but have actually improved upon the old rabbinical methods, both in impudence and in mendacity. I omit here the various histories of antisemitism, as unworthy of serious consideration, and shall give just three particular examples and one general example of the more modern 'scholarly' deceptions.

In 1962, a part of the Maimonidean Code referred to above, the so-called Book of Knowledge, which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text. (20) The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: 'It is a duty to exterminate them with one's own hands.' In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: 'It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.' But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of 'infidels' who must be exterminated: 'Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos (21) and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot'. Not one word of this appears in [25] the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.

The second example comes from the USA, again from an English translation of a book by Maimonides. Apart from his work on the codification of the Talmud, he was also a philosopher and his Guide to the Perplexed is justly considered to be the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy and is widely read and used even today.

Unfortunately, in addition to his attitude towards non-Jews generally and Christians in particular, Maimonides was also an anti-Black racist. Towards the end of the Guide, in a crucial chapter (book III, chapter 51) he discusses how various sections of humanity can attain the supreme religious value, the true worship of God. Among those who are incapable of even approaching this are:

"Some of the Turks [i.e., the Mongol race] and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does."

Now, what does one do with such a passage in a most important and necessary work of Judaism? Face the truth and its consequences? God forbid! Admit (as so many Christian scholars, for example, have done in similar circumstances) that a very important Jewish authority held also rabid anti-Black views, and by this admission make an attempt at self-education in real humanity? Perish the thought. I can almost imagine Jewish scholars in the USA consulting among themselves, 'What is to be done?' - for the book had to be translated, due to the decline in the knowledge of Hebrew among American Jews. Whether by consultation or by individual inspiration, a happy solution' was found: in the popular American translation of the Guide by one Friedlander, first published as far back as 1925 and since then reprinted in many editions, including several in paperback, the Hebrew word Kushim, which means Blacks, was simply transliterated and appears as 'Kushites', a word which means nothing to those who have no knowledge of Hebrew, or to whom an obliging rabbi will not give an oral explanation. (22) During all these years, not a word has been said to point out the initial deception or the social facts underlying its continuation - and this throughout the excitement of Martin Luther [26] King's campaigns, which were supported by so many rabbis, not to mention other Jewish figures, some of whom must have been aware of the anti-Black racist attitude which forms part of their Jewish heritage.” (pp23-25)

Jewish oddities are not new to this century or just derive from the Khazas in 7th century. These Jewishness were noticed and understood thousands years ago. Listen to Tacitus (Roman historian and senator (c. 56 – c. 120)

The customs of the Jews are base and abominable and owe their persistence to their depravity. Jews are extremely loyal to one another, always ready to show compassion, but towards every other people they feel only hate and enimity. As a race (the Jews are not a race, because they have mingled with the other races to the point that they are only a people, not a race), they are prone to lust; among themselves nothing is unlawful.

Ashkenormativity

But in modern time, Jews are not such “loyal” to one another. Like every society, there is a caste system like hierarchy among “Jewish people.”

Not only in the stolen land called the Jewish terrorist state, Ashkenazim Jews are on the top who look down and discriminate Sephardic Jews and other colored Jews, especially black Jews who “returned” from Africa.

The bottom line is:

Jew is a person who believes in such evil anti-humanity scriptures (Torah/Talmud), in Jewish supreme chosenism. Judaism is a anti-human cult of hate and death!

Therefore, logically, conclusively the term “a good Jew” is an oxymoron.

One is either Jew or a normal human being, one cannot be both. Ex-Jews are those '“de-judaified” and do reject such anti-humanity belief as Prof Shlomo Sand, Gilad Atzmon did.

That’s said. I am mindful of the fact that, apart from those declared ex-Jews, many truly good people who still (mis)identify themselves as Jewish, not because they believe in such satanic dispensesonalism of Judaism, but because somehow these good people still love and maintain the relationship with their parents and relatives and friends. That’s how the new absurd nonsensical term was invented “secular Jews.” Gilad Atzmon intelligently and superbly dissects this deceptive nonsensical term as an “Jewish lefty exclusive club!”

To those MIS-SELFIDENTIFIED JEWS such as Max Blumenthal, Aaron Matte, Ron Unz.. I do respect their free will, their freedom of choice of being identified as Jews for their own reasons or whatever may be. But by definition per universal modern notion of civil life, they are NOT Jewish, despite Torah/Talmud laws and edicts!

To those people like Rabbi Yaakov Shipiro , who has been trying to reform “Judaism” and trying to humanize Judaism for whatever reason. I respect his choice and freedom of worship and his well-intended effort. But the fact remains true in black and white print that Judaism is an anti-humanity cult of hate and death!

Please, stop bullshitting and gaslighting people with the differentiation between Zionism and Judaism.

—Appendix

(Deuteronomy 31):

[The LORD] will destroy these nations before you, and you shall dispossess them. Joshua is the one who will cross ahead of you, just as the LORD has spoken. “The LORD will do to them just as He did to Sihon and Og, the kings of the Amorites, and to their land, when He destroyed them. “The LORD will deliver them up before you, and you shall do to them according to all the commandments which I have commanded you.”

Then Joshua and all Israel with him went up from Eglon to Hebron, and they fought against it. They captured it and struck it and its king and all its cities and all the persons who were in it with the edge of the sword. He left no survivor, according to all that he had done to Eglon. And he utterly destroyed it and every person who was in it.

Samuel 15:3

"Go and attack the Amalekites! Destroy them and all their possessions. Don't have any pity. Kill their men, women, children, and even their babies. Slaughter their cattle, sheep, camels, and donkeys."

Brenton Septuagint

And now go, and thou shalt smite Amalec and Hierim and all that belongs to him, and thou shalt not save anything of him alive, but thou shalt utterly destroy him: and thou shalt devote him and all his to destruction, and thou shalt spare nothing belonging to him; and thou shalt slay both man and woman, and infant and suckling, and calf and sheep, and camel and ass.

If these ritualistic issues constituted the central features of traditional religious Judaism, we might regard it as a rather colorful and eccentric survival of ancient times. But unfortunately, there is also a far darker side, primarily involving the relationship between Jews and non-Jews, with the highly derogatory term goyim frequently used to describe the latter. To put it bluntly, Jews have divine souls and goyim do not, being merely beasts in the shape of men. Indeed, the primary reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve as the slaves of Jews, with some very high-ranking rabbis occasionally stating this well-known fact. In 2010, Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi used his weekly sermon to declare that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews and do work for them. The enslavement or extermination of all non-Jews seems an ultimate implied goal of the religion.

Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine and indeed obligatory to kill an innocent Gentile and take his. Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.

Original sources: https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-hamas-nazis-and-the-right-to-rape/

===

Schindler's List

by Steven Spielberg

Schindler's List

"Anyone who saves a life is as if he saved an entire world": Jewish life or any life?

One potentially apocryphal story speaks to a number of objections. A rabbinical looking gentleman was reported to have said. “Think that was about the Holocaust? That was about success, wasn’t it? The Holocaust is about 6 million people who get killed. ‘Schindler’s List’ was about 600 people who don’t.” The gentleman in question: Stanley Kubrick.

Very often, film treatments of the Holocaust, that don’t strive for the legendary length or documentary fastidiousness of “Shoah” end up focusing on lucky or singular victims. Because the most common stories of the Holocaust are lacking in uplift and propulsive narrative, nearly every dramatization follows the exceptions to the rule of genocide.

“Sophie’s Choice” follows an uncommon victim: a Catholic woman survivor. The protagonist of “Son of Saul” is not a typical inmate, but a sonderkommando trying to give a child burial rites. One can understand why Spielberg, riffing on Thomas Keneally’s novel would elect to tell the story of the Holocaust in a cinematic way. “Shoah” after all, already existed.

But what is inexcusable to many critics is not that Spielberg opted to tell a story of fortunate survivors, but that he chose a noble gentile as a protagonist.

In a 2011 ranking of Jewish films for Tablet, Liel Leibovitz puts “Schindler’s List” dead last, arguing “the fact that the movie, really, is about a Christ-like gentile who saves a horde of hapless Jews who have no agency or resolve of their own… makes ‘Schindler’s List’ not just one of the most ham-handed Holocaust films ever made but also, peculiarly, one of the least Jewish in sensibility.”

It is notable that, unlike William Styron or Keneally, Spielberg is a Jew. Which is why many Jewish critics have wondered why the film seems to pander to Christians with much of its imagery. One can reasonably argue that any popular filmmaker is directing for a Christian audience. But in giving them a man who is Righteous Among Nations, Spielberg may be letting them off easy, holding forth an extraordinary man at the expense of millions of others who did nothing.

The knottier question, that Hansen’s essay seeks to address is whether any representation of the Shoah can ever be justified or if it does and should resist any form of re-creation.

In “Why Spielberg Has Distorted the Truth,” Lanzmann accuses Spielberg of “fabrication” and writes that the Holocaust is “unique in that it erects a ring of fire around itself, a borderline that cannot be crossed because there is a certain ultimate degree of horror that cannot be transmitted. To claim it is possible to do so is to be guilty of the most serious transgression.”

In Lanzmann’s eyes, Spielberg was guilty for even trying, though the latter director never made a claim for anything definitive. He couldn’t. No one, not even Lanzmann could.

Whether the Holocaust is off limits for re-creation is not a question that can be easily answered, but “Schindler’s List” does do us the service of providing the most popular attempt. By rereleasing the film to theaters New Line is giving audiences across the United States another chance to evaluate the film. It’s now self-evident to any Jewish audience that is paying attention that we shouldn’t hold out hope for a gentile savior. What’s more, we can’t rely on any one piece of art to heal our country or tell our whole story. We must manage our expectations.

https://forward.com/culture/film-tv/415662/whats-wrong-with-schindlers-list-kind-of-a-lot/

The ability to criticize states and their policies—whether at home or abroad—is central to democratic governance. Weaponizing criticism of Israel as necessarily antisemitic not only devalues the term’s meaning, to the detriment of all Jews, but also threatens Americans’ free speech rights. By replacing the IHRA definition with the more accurate Nexus Document or Jerusalem Declaration, our society address antisemitism without insulating Israel from criticism for its actions or censoring its critics.